Feb 24, 2026
Crafting Your Brand Voice in the Age of AI

Zach Chmael
Head of Marketing
6 minutes

In This Article
It is no longer optional for today's growth-tasked individual to be prompting, training, and cajoling artificial intelligences with a significant amount of their time. There have been breakthroughs, to be sure, AI is starting to fulfill on the long-awaited promise of turning loyal marketers into department heroes.
Updated
Feb 24, 2026
Don’t Feed the Algorithm
The algorithm never sleeps, but you don’t have to feed it — Join our weekly newsletter for real insights on AI, human creativity & marketing execution.
TL;DR
🎭 Brand voice has become the last defensible moat. When 85% of marketers now use AI writing tools and everyone has access to the same language models, your distinctive perspective is the only thing that can't be replicated. Not your ideas. Not your information. Your voice.
🌊 The great homogenization is already here. 42% of businesses worry AI lacks originality. They're right. Feeds across the internet are filling with the same post wearing interchangeable names while the raw human feeling of the web washes away.
💰 Generic voice has real business costs. Brand consistency increases revenue 10-33%, while companies with distinctive personalities see 20% higher retention. When everyone sounds the same, nobody sounds like anyone worth trusting.
👁️ Audiences know. 83% of consumers can detect AI-generated content and actively avoid it. 60% of marketers worry AI could damage their brand's reputation. The concern isn't paranoia—it's pattern recognition.
✨ The answer isn't less AI—it's more taste. The brands that win will be those who use AI to amplify a distinctive human voice, not those who let AI replace the need for one. Taste, developed by decades of experience, becomes the new difference maker—or rather, returns to its status as the prized skill in marketing.

Zach Chmael
CMO, Averi
"We built Averi around the exact workflow we've used to scale our web traffic over 6000% in the last 6 months."
Your content should be working harder.
Averi's content engine builds Google entity authority, drives AI citations, and scales your visibility so you can get more customers.
Crafting Your Brand Voice in the Age of AI
Can Your Prompt Your Way To Authenticity?
When I began my marketing journey back in 2013, days were filled with Photoshop, the Facebook Business Manager, PR agency meetings, and long hours in front of a blank Word doc trying to craft the next blog post.
Things have certainly changed.
While marketers' days are still filled with context switching between far too many tools and balancing software and human partnerships, AI has entered the chat.
It is no longer optional for today's growth-tasked individual to be prompting, training, and cajoling artificial intelligences with a significant amount of their time. There have been breakthroughs, to be sure, AI is starting to fulfill on the long-awaited promise of turning loyal marketers into department heroes.
So where do we go from here? Have we reached marketing utopia?
Several of us are starting to raise flags around this new normal, and are proclaiming, "Well, not quite."
Those of us who have followed the tech evangelists' preachings, taken the courses, and become devout prompt machines are all starting to realize something concerning around the same time… AI can be incredible, but outputs all start looking the same.
Feeds and content hubs across the internet are filled with the same post with interchangeable names while the raw, human feeling of the web is washing away.
AI ad tools can be fantastic for iterating and cloning creatives from competitors. But where do we go after we've all cloned each other's ads, ad nauseam?

The Problem Nobody Wants to Name
This presents quite a problem for an industry that, unlike engineering, can't survive an AI formalization of processes and language that takes the spark away from the written word and visual moments.
How are we supposed to create lasting brands through a medium that only elaborately blends what has already been done?
What's the plan to break through the noise if, by all using the same models to write and create, we are the noise ourselves?
The data confirms what our intuition already suspected.
36% of businesses struggle to maintain consistent brand voice when using AI.
But here's the deeper truth: most of them didn't have a distinctive voice to maintain in the first place. They had tone guidelines sitting in a Google doc that no one reads, a vague sense of "professional but approachable," and a hope that consistency would somehow emerge from chaos.
AI didn't create this problem. It revealed it.
Before AI, you could hide a weak brand voice behind the friction of content creation. It took so long to produce anything that nobody noticed the absence of distinctiveness. Now, when 85% of marketers use AI tools and content can be generated in minutes, that friction is gone.
What remains is… if you don't know who you are, AI will helpfully make you sound like everyone f*cking else.
The Economics of Sameness
Let's talk about what generic voice actually costs.
Not in abstract terms about "brand equity" and "differentiation"—in actual business outcomes you can measure.
Brand consistency across all channels increases revenue by 10-33%.
The inverse is equally true: inconsistency actively damages the brand equity you've built. When content sounds different across channels, customers don't know what your brand stands for. And when they don't know what you stand for, they don't trust you enough to buy.
Companies with distinctive brand personalities see 20% higher customer retention compared to those with generic positioning. That's not a branding platitude—it's a measurable retention advantage that compounds over time.
64% of consumers say shared values are the primary reason they have a trusted relationship with a brand. But generic AI voice makes it impossible to communicate those values authentically. How do you share values through words that could have been written by any company in any industry about any product?
And here's the uncomfortable metric: human-created content gets 5.44x more traffic than AI-generated content that lacks distinctive voice. Not because humans are inherently better writers, but because authentic voice drives engagement in ways that optimized-but-generic content cannot.
The math is clear. Generic voice isn't just a branding problem, it's a growth problem wearing branding clothes.

The Detection Problem You Can't Prompt Your Way Out Of
Here's something the AI evangelists don't mention in their "10x your content" threads:
83% of consumers can detect AI-generated content and actively avoid it.
Eighty-three percent.
Not because they're running detection algorithms. Not because they're scrutinizing sentence structures. Because generic content feels generic.
The absence of perspective, the perfect smoothness, the careful avoidance of anything that might be controversial or interesting or alive, humans sense these things the way we sense when someone is being inauthentic in conversation.
60% of marketers who use generative AI worry it could negatively affect their brand's reputation. That concern is growing as awareness increases around the ways AI can distort messaging, introduce subtle errors, or simply make every brand sound like the same boardroom-approved, legally-reviewed, thoroughly-beige corporate entity.
The irony is rich… we've built tools that can generate infinite content, and we're using them to create content that people specifically avoid.
This is the trap.
The more you rely on AI to generate voice rather than amplify it, the more you blend into the growing ocean of content that audiences are increasingly skilled at ignoring.
The Valley's Edge
Today's change-filled era is ripe with both unbridled optimism and doom-gloom narratives to the point where any standard observer would feel confused.
Are we headed to the AI apocalypse where we spend our days serving our techno overlords, or is this the path to utopia?
Personally, I believe that, as with all things, it depends on the cumulation of small actions by the many.
Will you skip the grunt work and post another algorithm-feeding piece of AI slop today, or will you press the rails of those dusty old neural pathways to come up with something new?
Will you use the fresh and incredible tools at your disposal to unleash new levels of creativity, or laziness?
We stand at the valley's edge, looking into an unknown future, and I rest easy knowing that those who choose to continue honing true craft, pushing creative boundaries, and thinking far outside of the box will win the day.
We have become prompters, but now we must become something the world has never seen before: creative professionals armed with AI, but driven by the same ancient and hallowed traits of taste, invention, and imagination that our forefathers used to crawl out of the primordial soup and set the stage for us.

What Brand Voice Actually Is (And Isn't)
Before we talk about preserving voice in the age of AI, let's get clear on what voice actually means.
Brand voice is not tone. Tone is how you say things… friendly, professional, casual, authoritative. Tone shifts based on context. You speak differently at a funeral than at a party, but you're still you.
Brand voice is not messaging. Messaging is what you say… your value propositions, your differentiators, your positioning. Important, but not voice.
Brand voice is not style guidelines. Style guidelines tell you whether to use Oxford commas and how to format numbers. Necessary infrastructure, but infrastructure is not identity.
Brand voice is personality expressed through language. It's the cumulative effect of word choices, sentence rhythms, perspectives taken, subjects avoided, humor deployed or withheld, metaphors chosen, assumptions embedded. It's what makes someone read your content and think, "This sounds like them."
Voice emerges from:
Perspective: What you believe about the world that others don't
Values: What you'll defend even when it's unpopular
Taste: What you find interesting, beautiful, or worthy of attention
Experience: What you've learned that shapes how you see things
Limitations: What you refuse to do, say, or become
None of these things can be generated by AI. All of them can be amplified by it.
The Taste Differential
Like many challenges in life, the answer is much more obvious than we take it to be.
In a world awash with artificial intelligence, it is the unique ability of the human mind to be outlandish, authentically creative, and deeply original that becomes invaluable.
Taste, not via pattern recognition or algorithmic machine learning, but developed by decades of experience, becomes the new difference maker. Or rather, returns to its status as the prized skill in the marketing industry.
What is taste, exactly?
Taste is the accumulated wisdom of having paid attention to the world for a long time. It's knowing what works and what doesn't not because you've run A/B tests, but because you've absorbed thousands of examples of excellence and mediocrity and developed an intuitive sense for the difference.
Taste is knowing when to break the rules that AI will always follow.
Taste is recognizing that the slightly awkward sentence that sounds like a real person is better than the perfectly constructed sentence that sounds like nobody.
Taste is having opinions worth disagreeing with.
AI has no taste. It has patterns.
It can identify what has worked before and generate more of it. But taste is precisely the capacity to see what hasn't been done yet and recognize its potential. To choose the unexpected over the optimized. To prefer the distinctive over the safe.
94% of buyers recommend brands with which they have an emotional connection. Emotional connection requires someone on the other end worth connecting to. Pattern recognition doesn't create emotional connection. Taste does.

The Framework: Voice as Operating System
Most approaches to brand voice fail because they treat voice as a feature to be added rather than a foundation to build from.
They create tone guidelines after the content is already being produced. They bolt personality onto generic structures. They ask AI to "make it sound more like us" without ever defining what "us" sounds like.
Here's a different approach: treat your brand voice as an operating system that everything else runs on.
Layer 1: The Core (What You Believe)
This is the philosophical foundation, the perspectives and values that make your brand distinct from every other brand in your category.
Most companies skip this layer entirely. They have mission statements and value propositions, but they don't have genuine beliefs that shape how they see the world.
Examples of core beliefs that create distinctive voice:
"Marketing execution matters more than marketing strategy" (creates a voice that's practical, impatient with theory, focused on doing)
"AI should amplify human creativity, not replace it" (creates a voice that's nuanced about technology, values craft)
"Clarity is kindness" (creates a voice that's direct, economical, allergic to jargon)
If your core beliefs could apply to any company in your industry, they're not distinctive enough to generate distinctive voice.
Layer 2: The Character (How You Express)
This is where personality lives, not just tone, but the full texture of how your brand shows up in language.
Character includes:
Vocabulary preferences: What words you use and avoid
Sentence patterns: Long and flowing, or short and punchy
Metaphor domains: Where you draw comparisons from
Humor style: Dry, warm, self-deprecating, absent
Formality level: And when it shifts
Signature phrases: Expressions that become associated with your brand
Character can't be invented in a workshop. It has to emerge from the people who create your content, which is why voice documentation matters less than voice embodiment.
Layer 3: The Guardrails (What You Never Do)
Sometimes defining what you won't do is more useful than defining what you will.
Guardrails might include:
Never use jargon without defining it
Never make claims we can't support with evidence
Never sound like we're trying to impress
Never write anything we wouldn't say in conversation
Never sacrifice clarity for cleverness
Guardrails are especially important when AI is involved in content creation, because AI will default to the most common patterns unless explicitly constrained.
Documenting Voice for AI Collaboration
Here's where the rubber meets the road. You have a distinctive voice. How do you help AI understand and amplify it rather than dilute it?
The Voice Profile
A voice profile is a comprehensive document that captures everything AI needs to know to generate on-brand content. It includes:
Voice attributes (not just adjectives, but explanations):
"Confident" means stating opinions directly without hedging, not aggressive or dismissive
"Conversational" means sounding like a smart friend explaining something, not casual to the point of unprofessional
Example pairings (showing wrong vs. right):
Wrong: "We leverage cutting-edge solutions to optimize your marketing outcomes"
Right: "We help you ship better marketing, faster"
Vocabulary lists (both positive and negative):
Use: ship, build, create, fix, improve
Avoid: leverage, synergy, innovative, cutting-edge, solutions
Sentence patterns (with examples):
Start with the point, then elaborate
Use active voice
Keep sentences under 25 words when possible
Use questions to introduce sections
Context variations (how voice shifts by channel):
Blog posts: More expansive, can include personal perspective
Email: More direct, assume familiarity
Social: More playful, can use fragments
Sales: More benefit-focused, maintain warmth
Training the System
The voice profile is useless if it's just a document. It needs to be actively used in every AI interaction.
This means:
Including voice context in prompts: Not just "write a blog post about X" but "write a blog post about X following these voice guidelines: [paste voice profile]"
Creating feedback loops: When you edit AI output, note why you're editing it. These patterns become additional training data for future prompts.
Building example libraries: Collect your best on-voice content as examples that can be included in prompts. AI learns better from examples than from rules.
Testing consistency: Regularly generate content on similar topics and compare for voice drift. If Monday's blog post sounds different from Friday's, your process needs tightening.

The Human-AI Voice Collaboration Model
The goal isn't to remove humans from voice creation, it's to put humans in the right places.
Stage | Human Role | AI Role |
|---|---|---|
Voice Definition | Define beliefs, personality, guardrails | Organize and format documentation |
Content Strategy | Decide what to say and why | Research topics, identify questions |
First Draft | Set direction and key points | Generate structure and initial content |
Voice Injection | Add perspective, experience, opinion | Maintain consistency with guidelines |
Refinement | Make judgment calls on tone | Handle grammar, flow, optimization |
Quality Check | Ensure content sounds like the brand | Flag potential inconsistencies |
The key insight: AI handles the parts that don't require taste. Humans handle the parts that do.
This isn't about ego or job protection. It's about recognizing where each is genuinely better. AI is better at consistency, speed, and optimization. Humans are better at judgment, perspective, and the kind of creative choices that make content memorable.
The Practices of Voice Preservation
Beyond frameworks and documentation, certain practices help maintain distinctive voice over time.
Read Everything Aloud
Content with genuine voice sounds natural when spoken. Content that's been over-optimized or AI-generated without human refinement sounds awkward, stilted, robotic.
Before publishing, read your content out loud. If you stumble over phrasing, if sentences feel too long, if the rhythm feels unnatural, that's voice erosion.
Keep a Swipe File of Your Own Best Work
When you create content that perfectly captures your voice, save it. Not just to reuse, but to remind yourself what you sound like at your best.
When voice drifts, which it will, these examples become your north star.
Assign Voice Ownership
Someone needs to care about voice consistency the way engineers care about code quality. Not everyone, but someone whose job includes catching voice drift and maintaining standards.
Without ownership, voice becomes everyone's responsibility and therefore no one's.
Review AI Output Like You'd Review a Junior Writer
AI is not a vending machine. It's a junior writer who's talented but doesn't know your brand yet.
You wouldn't let a new hire publish without review. Same standard applies to AI. Every AI output should pass through human judgment before publication, not just for accuracy, but for voice.
Update Continuously
Voice evolves. Markets change. What felt fresh two years ago might feel dated today.
Build voice review into your content operations. Quarterly at minimum, assess whether your voice still resonates, still differentiates, still feels like you.
The Courage to Sound Like Yourself
Here's the uncomfortable truth beneath all the frameworks and processes:
Maintaining distinctive voice requires courage.
Distinctive voice means having opinions that not everyone will agree with. It means making choices that some audiences won't prefer. It means being memorable, which necessarily means being polarizing to some degree.
Generic voice is safe. Nobody gets fired for content that sounds like everybody else's content. No client complains that your tone was too distinctive.
But safe is the enemy of effective. 45% of consumers question brand authenticity when value messaging is inconsistent. And nothing is more inconsistent than trying to please everyone—saying one thing to one audience and another thing to another until you stand for nothing at all.
The brands that win in the age of AI will be the ones brave enough to sound like themselves even when it would be easier to sound like everyone else.

How Averi Approaches Voice in the Content Engine
We've lived this challenge ourselves. Building a content engine that produces at scale while maintaining distinctive voice required us to solve the very problems we've been discussing.
Our approach:
Brand Core learns your voice first. Before generating any content, Averi's system analyzes your existing content, website, and materials to understand your brand's distinctive characteristics—not just what you say, but how you say it.
Every piece runs through voice consistency checks. Content doesn't go from draft to published without verification that it sounds like your brand, not like generic AI output.
Human expertise is built into the workflow. AI handles research, structure, and optimization. You add the perspective, experience, and judgment that create distinctive voice. The collaboration is systematic, not ad-hoc.
The system learns from your edits. When you refine AI output, those refinements become training data. Over time, the content gets more on-voice automatically because the system is learning what "you" sounds like.
Voice documentation is living infrastructure. Not a PDF in a folder somewhere, but active context that shapes every piece of content generated.
This isn't about removing humans from the process. It's about putting human taste and judgment where they matter most while using AI to handle the rest.
The Choice Before Us
We stand at an inflection point.
The tools that were supposed to unleash creativity have, in many hands, achieved the opposite, flattening the internet into an endless beige expanse of content that technically answers questions without ever being worth reading.
But this isn't AI's fault. AI did what we asked it to.
We asked for more content, faster, and it delivered. We just forgot to ask for content worth remembering.
The brands that will matter in the years ahead understand something that the "10x your content" crowd missed entirely: in an era of infinite content, the scarce resource isn't production capacity, it's distinctiveness. Not information, but perspective. Not words, but voice.
AI can help you say more. Only you can help you say something worth hearing.
The technology exists to scale your voice without diluting it. The frameworks exist to maintain distinctiveness while increasing velocity. The opportunity exists to stand out precisely because so many others are blending in.
The only question is whether you'll have the taste to use these tools wisely, and the courage to sound like yourself in a world that makes it so easy to sound like everyone else.
The valley awaits. What you bring to it… that's up to you.
Find Your Brand Voice with Averi →
Related Resources
Guides & How-Tos
AI Content That Doesn't Sound Like AI: The Brand Voice System That Actually Works
How to Create Thought Leadership Content That Doesn't Sound AI-Generated
E-E-A-T for Startups: How to Build Authority Signals When You're Unknown
Content Pillars for Startups: How to Choose Your 3-5 Core Topics
Blog Posts
The AI Content Crisis: Why Your Brand Voice Sounds Like Everyone Else's
Everyone Became a Publisher. Almost No One Became Worth Reading.
2026 Is the Year You Probably Should Become a Content Engineer
The Future of B2B SaaS Marketing: GEO, AI Search, and LLM Optimization
Definitions
FAQs
Can AI actually learn my brand voice?
AI can learn patterns from examples—word choices, sentence structures, typical phrasings. What it cannot learn is why you make those choices, when to break your own patterns, or what new creative directions would feel authentically "you." The best approach treats AI as a tool that can replicate documented voice characteristics while relying on humans for the judgment and evolution that voice requires.
How do I know if my content is losing its distinctive voice?
Several signals indicate voice drift: engagement metrics declining on previously successful formats, customers describing your brand differently than you describe yourselves, content that could plausibly appear on any competitor's site, team members describing your tone inconsistently, and the "read aloud" test revealing awkward or generic phrasing. Regular voice audits catch drift before it compounds.
How much should I edit AI-generated content?
Enough that it sounds like you wrote it. For most brands, this means substantial editing—not just fixing errors, but injecting perspective, adding specific examples, adjusting rhythm and phrasing. 42% of businesses worry AI lacks originality; editing is how you add it back. Over time, as your AI workflow learns from your edits, the editing required should decrease—but the human judgment check should remain.
Is it worth documenting brand voice if we're a small team?
Especially if you're a small team. When voice exists only in people's heads, it leaves when they do. Documentation creates continuity as teams grow and change. It also forces clarity—the process of documenting voice often reveals that different team members have different ideas of what your brand sounds like. Better to discover and resolve those differences now than to discover them in inconsistent published content.
How do I balance efficiency with authenticity?
By putting humans where they matter most. Research, structure, formatting, optimization—AI handles these efficiently without voice risk. Perspective, opinion, examples, judgment calls—these require human involvement to maintain authenticity. The goal isn't maximum AI involvement; it's right-sized AI involvement that preserves what makes your brand distinctive while accelerating everything else.
Does distinctive voice matter for SEO?
Increasingly, yes. Google's E-E-A-T framework rewards content demonstrating Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness—qualities that generic AI content struggles to convey. AI search systems are learning to identify and prefer content with genuine perspective and unique insight. Human content gets 5.44x more traffic than generic AI output in part because search systems are evolving to recognize and reward authenticity.






