Jan 21, 2026

AI Content That Doesn't Sound Like AI: The Brand Voice System That Actually Works

Zach Chmael

Head of Marketing

8 minutes

In This Article

Generic tools produce generic output because they lack brand context. When you prompt ChatGPT cold, you're asking a tool trained on the entire internet to somehow channel your specific brand voice. That's like asking a stranger to write your wedding toast based on a one-sentence description of your personality.

Updated

Jan 21, 2026

Don’t Feed the Algorithm

The algorithm never sleeps, but you don’t have to feed it — Join our weekly newsletter for real insights on AI, human creativity & marketing execution.

TL;DR

  • 🤖 The generic AI content problem is real. 60% of marketers who use generative AI are concerned it could harm brand reputation due to bias, plagiarism, and values misalignment. The concern isn't paranoia—it's pattern recognition.

  • 📊 17% of search results are now AI-generated, and audiences are increasingly numb to formulaic content. 32% of consumers say AI is negatively disrupting the creator economy—up from 18% in 2023.

  • 🎯 The problem isn't AI—it's the workflow. Generic AI tools produce generic output because they lack persistent brand context. Every session starts from scratch, producing content that could belong to anyone.

  • The solution is a Brand Voice System: Brand Core → Voice Guidelines → Systematic Review → Iteration. This workflow transforms AI from a generic content generator into a brand-trained writing partner.

  • 🏆 Results speak: Teams using systematic brand voice training report 95% usable content on first drafts, saving hours of editing while maintaining distinctive voice.

AI Content That Doesn't Sound Like AI: The Brand Voice System That Actually Works

The Fear Is Justified (But Solvable)

Let's be honest about the elephant in every marketing meeting: AI content often sounds f*cking terrible.

You know the symptoms… bland corporate-speak, endless hedging phrases, that weirdly formal tone that sounds like a committee wrote it by consensus. The content that technically says something but somehow says nothing. The blog posts that could belong to literally any company in your space.

This fear isn't irrational. The data backs it up:

The marketing world is drowning in AI slop.

Content hubs across the internet are filled with the same posts wearing interchangeable brand names while the raw, human feeling of the web washes away. Feed any ten AI tools the same prompt, and you'll get ten variations of the same generic response.

But I'm here to tell you the problem isn't AI itself, it's how AI is being used.

Generic tools produce generic output because they lack brand context. When you prompt ChatGPT cold, you're asking a tool trained on the entire internet to somehow channel your specific brand voice. That's like asking a stranger to write your wedding toast based on a one-sentence description of your personality.

The companies producing distinctive AI content aren't using different AI. They're using a different system.

Why Most AI Content Sounds the Same

Before we fix the problem, we need to understand it. AI content sounds generic for three specific, addressable reasons:

1. Zero Persistent Context

Most AI interactions start from a blank slate. Every time you open ChatGPT or Claude, you're beginning a new conversation with a tool that knows nothing about your brand, your audience, your voice, or your positioning.

Even when building a project, things are often lost between days and different conversations.

You compensate by adding context to every prompt: "Write in a friendly but professional tone for a B2B SaaS audience that values simplicity..."

But this manual context injection is:

  • Inconsistent: Different team members add different context (or forget entirely)

  • Incomplete: You can't capture brand voice nuance in a prompt prefix

  • Exhausting: Re-explaining your brand to AI for every piece of content

So you're left with content that's technically correct but emotionally empty. It sounds like AI because AI is filling in the blanks with generic defaults.

2. No Brand Memory

Even when you nail the prompt once, that success doesn't carry forward.

Generic AI tools have no mechanism to remember what worked, learn from your edits, or compound their understanding of your brand over time.

You spend 30 minutes crafting the perfect blog post, editing the voice until it sounds right. Then next week, you start over. The AI learned nothing from your refinements. You're in a perpetual loop of teaching the same lessons.

This is the opposite of how human writers develop brand fluency.

A good human writer gets better at your voice with every piece. Generic AI resets to zero every session.

3. Trained on Everything = Expert in Nothing

Large language models are trained on the entire internet, which means they're trained on millions of examples of bland corporate content.

When you ask AI to write marketing copy without specific guidance, it defaults to the statistical average of all marketing copy it's ever seen.

And the statistical average of all marketing copy is... forgettable.

AI tools naturally drift toward safe, generic phrasing because that's what dominates their training data. They avoid the distinctive, the opinionated, the specific… exactly the qualities that make content memorable.

The Brand Voice System: A Four-Part Framework

Producing distinctive AI content requires moving from "tool" thinking to "system" thinking.

Instead of asking "how do I write a better prompt?", ask "how do I build a workflow that consistently produces on-brand content?"

The answer is a Brand Voice System with four interconnected components:


Let's break down each component.

Part 1: Brand Core—Your AI's Foundation

The Brand Core is everything AI needs to understand your brand before it writes a single word. This isn't a prompt, it's a persistent knowledge base that contextualizes every interaction.

What Goes Into Brand Core

Company Foundation

  • What you do (in 25 words or less)

  • Who you serve (specific ICPs, not "businesses")

  • Your core value proposition

  • What makes you different from alternatives

  • Your origin story and key milestones

Voice & Personality

  • 3-5 voice attributes with definitions (not just words—explanations)

  • What you sound like (with examples)

  • What you don't sound like (equally important)

  • Vocabulary to use and avoid

  • Sentence structure preferences

  • Formality level by content type

Positioning & Messaging

  • Category you compete in

  • Key competitors and how you differ

  • Core messaging pillars

  • Proof points and supporting evidence

  • Common objections and responses

Audience Intelligence

  • ICP details: roles, challenges, goals, fears

  • How your audience talks about their problems

  • What language resonates vs. falls flat

  • Stage-specific messaging (awareness → consideration → decision)

Brand Core Example: Voice Attributes

Don't just list adjectives. Define them with examples:

Attribute

Definition

Sounds Like

Doesn't Sound Like

Confident

We speak with authority earned through experience. No hedging or excessive caveats.

"Here's what works."

"This might possibly help some people in certain situations..."

Direct

We get to the point. No throat-clearing, no preamble, no corporate padding.

"Marketing attribution is broken. Here's why."

"In today's ever-evolving marketing landscape, it's becoming increasingly important to consider..."

Conversational

We write like smart people talk. Complex ideas in accessible language.

"Let's break this down."

"One must endeavor to comprehend the multifaceted nature of..."

Opinionated

We take positions. We're willing to be wrong but unwilling to be boring.

"Most SEO advice is outdated. Here's what actually moves the needle."

"There are many perspectives on SEO, and all have merit."

Why Brand Core Changes Everything

When AI has persistent access to Brand Core, the dynamic shifts fundamentally:

Without Brand Core:

Prompt: "Write a blog intro about marketing automation"

Output: "In today's fast-paced digital landscape, marketing automation has become an essential tool for businesses looking to streamline their operations and improve efficiency..."

With Brand Core:

Output: "Marketing automation promises to fix everything. Set it and forget it, they say. Run campaigns while you sleep. The reality? Most marketing automation becomes expensive email spam. Here's how to actually make it work."

Same topic. Completely different content. The difference is context, AI that knows your brand writes like your brand.

Part 2: Voice Guidelines—The Tactical Playbook

Brand Core provides the strategic foundation. Voice Guidelines translate that foundation into specific, actionable rules AI can follow.

The Voice Guidelines Framework

1. Sentence-Level Patterns

Document specific patterns that make your voice distinctive:

  • Sentence length: "Vary between 8-25 words. Avoid sentences over 30 words. Use fragments intentionally for emphasis."

  • Paragraph structure: "Lead with the point. Never bury the insight. First sentence should be quotable."

  • Punctuation habits: "Use em dashes for asides—like this. Colons for lists. Avoid semicolons; they feel academic."

2. Vocabulary Rules

Create a brand dictionary:

Use This

Not This

Why

Build

Leverage

"Leverage" is corporate jargon

Team

Resources

People aren't resources

Simple

User-friendly

"User-friendly" is overused

Works

Is effective

Show, don't tell

Start

Commence

Conversation, not contracts

3. Opening & Closing Patterns

Most AI content sounds generic because openings and closings default to templates. Document your alternatives:

Avoid these openings:

  • "In today's [adjective] [noun]..."

  • "Are you looking to [verb] your [noun]?"

  • "When it comes to [topic]..."

  • "[Topic] is more important than ever..."

Use these patterns instead:

  • Direct challenge: "Most [topic] advice is wrong."

  • Specific scenario: "You've spent $50K on ads with nothing to show for it."

  • Counterintuitive claim: "[Thing everyone believes] is actually hurting you."

  • Story hook: "Last Tuesday, our CEO deleted our marketing automation."

4. Format Preferences by Content Type

Different content types require different voice applications:

Content Type

Formality

Length

Structure

Voice Notes

Blog posts

Conversational

1,500-3,000 words

TL;DR → Sections → FAQ

Can be opinionated

Email sequences

Warm, direct

150-300 words

One idea per email

Personal pronouns heavy

Social posts

Punchy, confident

Platform-specific

Hook → Value → CTA

Permission to be bold

Website copy

Confident, clear

Scannable

Headlines carry load

Benefits over features

Documentation

Helpful, precise

As needed

Task-oriented

Friendly but accurate

Training AI on Voice Guidelines

Voice guidelines work best when you provide examples, not just rules. For each guideline, include:

The Rule: "We never use passive voice in headlines."

Bad Example: "Marketing Results Can Be Improved With This Tool"

Good Example: "This Tool Triples Your Marketing Results"

Why: Active voice is more direct, more confident, and easier to scan.

AI learns better from patterns than from instructions. Show it what good looks like, and it will pattern-match more effectively than if you just tell it what to do.

Part 3: Systematic Review—The Quality Gate

Even with Brand Core and Voice Guidelines, AI output requires human review.

But "review" doesn't mean "rewrite from scratch." Systematic review means having a consistent process that catches voice drift efficiently.

The Three-Pass Review Framework

Pass 1: Voice Check (2 minutes)

Read the first two paragraphs out loud. Ask:

  • Does this sound like us?

  • Would I share this without embarrassment?

  • Is there any phrase that could appear on a competitor's site unchanged?

If the answer to any is wrong, stop and provide AI with specific feedback before continuing.

Pass 2: Structure Check (3 minutes)

Scan the full piece for:

  • Opening: Does it hook immediately or throat-clear?

  • Flow: Does each section earn the next?

  • Ending: Does it land or just stop?

  • Formatting: Does it match our style guide?

Mark sections that need work rather than editing immediately.

Pass 3: Detail Polish (5-10 minutes)

Now edit:

  • Replace generic phrases with specific alternatives

  • Add examples from your company's actual experience

  • Inject personality where the content feels flat

  • Cut anything that doesn't earn its space

The Review Checklist

Use this checklist for every piece of AI content:

Voice Alignment

  • [ ] Could only come from our brand (not generic)

  • [ ] Matches the appropriate formality level

  • [ ] Uses our vocabulary, not corporate defaults

  • [ ] Takes positions rather than hedging

Quality Standards

  • [ ] Opening hooks within first 50 words

  • [ ] Every section has a clear point

  • [ ] No paragraph exceeds 4 sentences

  • [ ] Ends with purpose, not just stopping

Accuracy & Authenticity

  • [ ] All facts verified (AI hallucinates)

  • [ ] Statistics have sources

  • [ ] Examples are real (or clearly hypothetical)

  • [ ] No claims we can't support

Building Voice Consistency Metrics

Track voice alignment over time:

  • First-draft usability rate: What percentage of AI content is usable with minimal edits?

  • Voice deviation incidents: How often does AI drift into generic territory?

  • Edit time per piece: Is it decreasing as the system improves?

Teams using systematic brand voice training report achieving 95% usable content on first drafts. That's the benchmark to aim for.

Part 4: Iteration—The Compounding Advantage

The fourth component transforms a one-time setup into a self-improving system. Every piece of content you create makes the next piece better.

The Feedback Loop

When you edit AI content to match your voice, that edit becomes training data. Capture:

  1. What the AI produced (the original output)

  2. What you changed (the edited version)

  3. Why you changed it (the principle behind the edit)

Over time, these captured edits become additional Voice Guidelines that refine AI output.

Library Storage: Building Brand Memory

Every published piece should be stored in a content library that AI can reference. This creates:

Stylistic precedent: AI can see how you've handled similar topics before.

Vocabulary patterns: AI learns which words and phrases you actually use, not just what you say you prefer.

Structural templates: AI understands how you organize different content types.

The more content in your library, the better AI matches your voice.

This is the compounding advantage generic tools can't offer, a flywheel where every piece of content makes future content better.

Continuous Improvement Cycle

Timeframe

Action

Purpose

Weekly

Review voice consistency in published content

Catch drift early

Monthly

Update Voice Guidelines based on edits

Formalize learnings

Quarterly

Audit Brand Core for accuracy

Ensure foundation stays current

Ongoing

Add successful content to library

Build AI's reference base

The Averi Implementation: How It Actually Works

This Brand Voice System sounds great in theory. But implementing it with generic AI tools requires significant manual overhead, maintaining separate documents, copying context into every prompt, building your own review workflows.

Averi's content engine implements this system natively, automating what would otherwise require hours of manual coordination.

Phase 1: Brand Core Capture

When you onboard to Averi, the system scrapes your website to automatically learn:

  • Your business, products, and positioning

  • Your voice patterns from existing content

  • Your vocabulary and messaging themes

You review and refine what Averi learned, then confirm. The Brand Core persists across every interaction, you're not re-explaining your brand each session.

Phase 2: Voice Guidelines Integration

Averi applies voice guidelines to every draft:

In the Discuss Phase: Averi asks clarifying questions to understand context—who's this for, what's the goal, what angle should we take. It learns detail-questions specific to each asset type (blog post vs. LinkedIn post vs. email).

In the Draft Phase: AI generates with your Brand Core context loaded, applying structural preferences and vocabulary rules automatically.

In the Edit Phase: You refine in an editing canvas where you can highlight any section and ask Averi to rewrite with specific guidance: "Make this more direct" or "This sounds too corporate, punch it up."

Phase 3: Systematic Review Built In

Every piece created in Averi goes through a review workflow:

  • Comments and tagging for team collaboration

  • Version history tracking changes

The review process isn't separate from creation, it's integrated into the same canvas.

Phase 4: Library Compounding

Published content saves to your Averi Content Engine, training the AI on:

  • Your actual published voice (not just guidelines)

  • Successful content patterns

  • Topic coverage and internal linking opportunities

Each piece strengthens the next. The system literally gets better at matching your brand with every article you create.

Phase 5: Proactive Optimization

Averi gets stronger and smarter as you go.

It utilizes every piece of content you publish to naturally build content clusters in all future content. Analytics are tracked, keyword trends are reviewed and competitor content is analyzed so that Averi can proactively recommend and queue future content for you to create.

This is what closes the loop to your engine, so your strategy & results compound over time.

The Difference This Makes

Generic AI (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.):

  • Starts from zero every session

  • Requires manual context injection

  • No memory between conversations

  • Voice consistency depends entirely on your prompting

Averi's Brand Voice System:

  • Brand Core loads automatically

  • Voice guidelines applied by default

  • Library builds compound knowledge

  • AI genuinely improves at your voice over time

The output difference is stark. Content that sounds like your brand, not like AI, not like a committee, not like content that could belong to anyone.

Get Started With Averi →

Practical Implementation: Start Here

You don't need Averi to implement a Brand Voice System (though it certainly helps). Here's how to start with whatever tools you have:

Week 1: Document Your Brand Core

Create a single document with:

  1. Company positioning statement (25 words)

  2. Three ICPs with specific details

  3. Five voice attributes with definitions and examples

  4. Ten vocabulary rules (use this, not that)

  5. Five example paragraphs that capture your voice perfectly

This document becomes your context injection for every AI prompt.

Week 2: Establish Voice Guidelines

Build a tactical playbook:

  1. Opening patterns you love (with examples)

  2. Openings to avoid (with examples of what not to do)

  3. Format templates for each content type

  4. Section-by-section guidelines for your most common content

Week 3: Create Your Review Process

Define your quality gate:

  1. Who reviews AI content before publishing?

  2. What checklist do they use?

  3. How do you capture learnings from edits?

  4. Where do you store examples of good voice?

Week 4: Build Your Iteration System

Close the feedback loop:

  1. Create a content library (even a Google Drive folder works)

  2. Track voice consistency metrics

  3. Schedule monthly Voice Guidelines updates

  4. Document successful patterns for reuse

The Prompt Template

Until you have a dedicated system, use this template for every AI content request:

[BRAND CONTEXT]
Company: [Who you are in 25 words]
Audience: [Specific ICP for this piece]
Voice: [3-5 attributes with brief definitions]
Avoid: [Words, phrases, and patterns to skip]

[CONTENT BRIEF]
Type: [Blog post, email, social, etc.]
Goal: [What should the reader do/think/feel?]
Key points: [What must be included]
Length: [Target word count]

[VOICE EXAMPLES]
This sounds like us:
"[Example paragraph in your voice]"

This doesn't sound like us:
"[Example of generic content to avoid]"

[REQUEST]
Write [content type] about [topic] for [audience]

It's not as seamless as a dedicated system, but it dramatically outperforms prompting cold.

The Voice Anti-Patterns: What to Watch For

Even with a system, AI content can drift. Watch for these warning signs:

1. The Hedging Epidemic

Symptom: Every claim comes with qualifiers.

"This approach might potentially help some businesses achieve somewhat better results in certain situations."

Fix: Delete the hedges. Make direct claims. If you're not confident enough to state something directly, either verify it or cut it.

2. The Thesaurus Plague

Symptom: Unnecessarily complex vocabulary where simple words work better.

"Leverage our comprehensive solution to optimize your operational efficiency."

Fix: Enforce simple vocabulary rules. "Use" not "leverage." "Improve" not "optimize." "Run" not "operational efficiency."

3. The Preamble Problem

Symptom: Content that takes forever to get to the point.

"In today's rapidly evolving digital landscape, businesses of all sizes are increasingly recognizing the important role that marketing plays in their overall success. As we navigate these changes, it's crucial to understand..."

Fix: Delete everything before the first interesting sentence. Start where the content actually begins.

4. The Generic Conclusion

Symptom: Endings that say nothing.

"By following these steps, you can improve your marketing and achieve better results for your business."

Fix: End with specificity. What exact next step should they take? What specific outcome should they expect?

5. The Committee Voice

Symptom: Content that sounds like it was written to offend no one.

"There are many valid perspectives on this topic, and it's important to consider all viewpoints when making your decision."

Fix: Take a position. Be willing to be wrong but unwilling to be boring. The best brands have opinions.

Measuring Voice Quality

How do you know if your Brand Voice System is working?

Quantitative Metrics

First-Draft Usability Rate Track what percentage of AI drafts are publishable with minor edits only (under 10 minutes of work). Target: 80%+.

Voice Deviation Rate Track how often content requires major voice correction (complete rewrites, fundamental tone shifts). Target: Under 10%.

Time to Publish Track average time from content request to published piece. Should decrease as system improves.

Consistency Score If you have multiple writers (AI or human), have editors rate voice consistency across pieces on a 1-5 scale. Target: 4+ average.

Qualitative Indicators

The Blindfold Test Show team members content without any branding. Can they identify it as yours? If not, voice isn't distinctive enough.

The Competitor Swap Test Could this content appear on a competitor's site unchanged? If yes, it's too generic.

The Reading Aloud Test Read content out loud. Does it sound like how you'd actually talk about this topic? Or does it sound like a press release?

The Share Test Would you share this content on your personal LinkedIn without feeling embarrassed? If you'd hesitate, the quality isn't there.

The Choice Ahead

We stand at a fork in content marketing.

Path 1: Use AI as a generic content generator. Pump out forgettable articles that blur into the noise. Race to the bottom on volume while quality erodes and audiences tune out.

Path 2: Use AI as a brand-trained writing partner. Build a system that compounds—where every piece makes the next piece better, where voice consistency improves over time, where content genuinely reflects your brand's perspective.

The tools are the same. The difference is the system.

Those of us who have followed the AI evangelists' preachings are all starting to realize something concerning… AI can be incredible, but outputs all start looking the same.

Feeds and content hubs across the internet are filled with the same post wearing interchangeable names while the raw, human feeling of the web washes away.

The answer is obvious.

In a world awash with AI content, it is the unique ability of the human mind to bring taste, perspective, and genuine originality that becomes invaluable. Taste—not pattern recognition or algorithmic blending, but developed through experience—becomes the difference maker.

The Brand Voice System doesn't replace that human element. It amplifies it.

It takes your distinctive perspective and scales it across every piece of content, without losing the soul that makes your brand memorable.

AI has given every marketer the same capabilities. What separates the signal from the noise is the system behind the tool.

Build the system. Own the voice. Stand out.

Related Resources

Brand Voice & AI Content Quality

AI Content Creation & Quality

Content Engine & Workflow

Thought Leadership & Content Strategy

Founder & Solo Marketer Guides

LLM Optimization & AI Visibility

Definitions & Key Concepts

FAQs

Can AI really match a distinctive brand voice?

Yes, but not out of the box. Generic AI produces generic output because it lacks brand context. With persistent Brand Core, documented Voice Guidelines, systematic review, and iterative improvement, AI can produce content that genuinely matches brand voice. Teams using these systems report 95% usable content on first drafts. The difference isn't the AI model—it's the system around it.

How long does it take to train AI on brand voice?

Initial Brand Core and Voice Guidelines documentation takes 4-8 hours of focused work. The system then improves continuously through use. Most teams see significant voice improvement within 2-4 weeks of consistent use as the library builds and feedback loops refine guidelines. The compounding effect means the system gets better over time, unlike generic AI which starts from zero every session.

Should I disclose when content is AI-assisted?

There's no legal requirement in most jurisdictions, but transparency builds trust. More importantly, the goal isn't to hide AI use—it's to produce content good enough that disclosure doesn't matter. If your AI content is distinctive, valuable, and genuinely reflects your brand perspective, the method of production is secondary. Focus on quality, not concealment.

What if AI content still sounds generic after implementing this system?

Common causes include: Brand Core that's too vague (add more specific examples), Voice Guidelines without enough patterns (show more, tell less), insufficient library content for AI reference, or skipping the review process. Diagnose by checking where in the system the breakdown occurs. Usually, adding more concrete examples at the Brand Core and Voice Guidelines level solves persistent generic output.

How does this compare to Jasper's brand voice feature?

Tools like Jasper offer brand voice training, but typically as a feature within a broader content generation tool. Jasper's brand voice produces strong content after proper setup. The difference with a comprehensive Brand Voice System is the integration: Brand Core that informs strategy (not just tone), Voice Guidelines that cover structure and format (not just word choice), review workflows built into the creation process, and library compounding that improves over time. Brand voice features help; brand voice systems transform.

Does this work for all content types?

The framework applies universally, but Voice Guidelines should vary by content type. A LinkedIn post has different voice requirements than a technical white paper. Build format-specific guidelines within your overall system. Most teams find that once they nail voice for one content type, extending to others becomes much easier—the core principles transfer, only the tactical application changes.

Continue Reading

The latest handpicked blog articles

Don't Feed the Algorithm

“Top 3 tech + AI newsletters in the country. Always sharp, always actionable.”

"Genuinely my favorite newsletter in tech. No fluff, no cheesy ads, just great content."

“Clear, practical, and on-point. Helps me keep up without drowning in noise.”

User-Generated Content & Authenticity in the Age of AI

Zach Chmael

Head of Marketing

8 minutes

In This Article

Generic tools produce generic output because they lack brand context. When you prompt ChatGPT cold, you're asking a tool trained on the entire internet to somehow channel your specific brand voice. That's like asking a stranger to write your wedding toast based on a one-sentence description of your personality.

Don’t Feed the Algorithm

The algorithm never sleeps, but you don’t have to feed it — Join our weekly newsletter for real insights on AI, human creativity & marketing execution.

TL;DR

  • 🤖 The generic AI content problem is real. 60% of marketers who use generative AI are concerned it could harm brand reputation due to bias, plagiarism, and values misalignment. The concern isn't paranoia—it's pattern recognition.

  • 📊 17% of search results are now AI-generated, and audiences are increasingly numb to formulaic content. 32% of consumers say AI is negatively disrupting the creator economy—up from 18% in 2023.

  • 🎯 The problem isn't AI—it's the workflow. Generic AI tools produce generic output because they lack persistent brand context. Every session starts from scratch, producing content that could belong to anyone.

  • The solution is a Brand Voice System: Brand Core → Voice Guidelines → Systematic Review → Iteration. This workflow transforms AI from a generic content generator into a brand-trained writing partner.

  • 🏆 Results speak: Teams using systematic brand voice training report 95% usable content on first drafts, saving hours of editing while maintaining distinctive voice.

AI Content That Doesn't Sound Like AI: The Brand Voice System That Actually Works

The Fear Is Justified (But Solvable)

Let's be honest about the elephant in every marketing meeting: AI content often sounds f*cking terrible.

You know the symptoms… bland corporate-speak, endless hedging phrases, that weirdly formal tone that sounds like a committee wrote it by consensus. The content that technically says something but somehow says nothing. The blog posts that could belong to literally any company in your space.

This fear isn't irrational. The data backs it up:

The marketing world is drowning in AI slop.

Content hubs across the internet are filled with the same posts wearing interchangeable brand names while the raw, human feeling of the web washes away. Feed any ten AI tools the same prompt, and you'll get ten variations of the same generic response.

But I'm here to tell you the problem isn't AI itself, it's how AI is being used.

Generic tools produce generic output because they lack brand context. When you prompt ChatGPT cold, you're asking a tool trained on the entire internet to somehow channel your specific brand voice. That's like asking a stranger to write your wedding toast based on a one-sentence description of your personality.

The companies producing distinctive AI content aren't using different AI. They're using a different system.

Why Most AI Content Sounds the Same

Before we fix the problem, we need to understand it. AI content sounds generic for three specific, addressable reasons:

1. Zero Persistent Context

Most AI interactions start from a blank slate. Every time you open ChatGPT or Claude, you're beginning a new conversation with a tool that knows nothing about your brand, your audience, your voice, or your positioning.

Even when building a project, things are often lost between days and different conversations.

You compensate by adding context to every prompt: "Write in a friendly but professional tone for a B2B SaaS audience that values simplicity..."

But this manual context injection is:

  • Inconsistent: Different team members add different context (or forget entirely)

  • Incomplete: You can't capture brand voice nuance in a prompt prefix

  • Exhausting: Re-explaining your brand to AI for every piece of content

So you're left with content that's technically correct but emotionally empty. It sounds like AI because AI is filling in the blanks with generic defaults.

2. No Brand Memory

Even when you nail the prompt once, that success doesn't carry forward.

Generic AI tools have no mechanism to remember what worked, learn from your edits, or compound their understanding of your brand over time.

You spend 30 minutes crafting the perfect blog post, editing the voice until it sounds right. Then next week, you start over. The AI learned nothing from your refinements. You're in a perpetual loop of teaching the same lessons.

This is the opposite of how human writers develop brand fluency.

A good human writer gets better at your voice with every piece. Generic AI resets to zero every session.

3. Trained on Everything = Expert in Nothing

Large language models are trained on the entire internet, which means they're trained on millions of examples of bland corporate content.

When you ask AI to write marketing copy without specific guidance, it defaults to the statistical average of all marketing copy it's ever seen.

And the statistical average of all marketing copy is... forgettable.

AI tools naturally drift toward safe, generic phrasing because that's what dominates their training data. They avoid the distinctive, the opinionated, the specific… exactly the qualities that make content memorable.

The Brand Voice System: A Four-Part Framework

Producing distinctive AI content requires moving from "tool" thinking to "system" thinking.

Instead of asking "how do I write a better prompt?", ask "how do I build a workflow that consistently produces on-brand content?"

The answer is a Brand Voice System with four interconnected components:


Let's break down each component.

Part 1: Brand Core—Your AI's Foundation

The Brand Core is everything AI needs to understand your brand before it writes a single word. This isn't a prompt, it's a persistent knowledge base that contextualizes every interaction.

What Goes Into Brand Core

Company Foundation

  • What you do (in 25 words or less)

  • Who you serve (specific ICPs, not "businesses")

  • Your core value proposition

  • What makes you different from alternatives

  • Your origin story and key milestones

Voice & Personality

  • 3-5 voice attributes with definitions (not just words—explanations)

  • What you sound like (with examples)

  • What you don't sound like (equally important)

  • Vocabulary to use and avoid

  • Sentence structure preferences

  • Formality level by content type

Positioning & Messaging

  • Category you compete in

  • Key competitors and how you differ

  • Core messaging pillars

  • Proof points and supporting evidence

  • Common objections and responses

Audience Intelligence

  • ICP details: roles, challenges, goals, fears

  • How your audience talks about their problems

  • What language resonates vs. falls flat

  • Stage-specific messaging (awareness → consideration → decision)

Brand Core Example: Voice Attributes

Don't just list adjectives. Define them with examples:

Attribute

Definition

Sounds Like

Doesn't Sound Like

Confident

We speak with authority earned through experience. No hedging or excessive caveats.

"Here's what works."

"This might possibly help some people in certain situations..."

Direct

We get to the point. No throat-clearing, no preamble, no corporate padding.

"Marketing attribution is broken. Here's why."

"In today's ever-evolving marketing landscape, it's becoming increasingly important to consider..."

Conversational

We write like smart people talk. Complex ideas in accessible language.

"Let's break this down."

"One must endeavor to comprehend the multifaceted nature of..."

Opinionated

We take positions. We're willing to be wrong but unwilling to be boring.

"Most SEO advice is outdated. Here's what actually moves the needle."

"There are many perspectives on SEO, and all have merit."

Why Brand Core Changes Everything

When AI has persistent access to Brand Core, the dynamic shifts fundamentally:

Without Brand Core:

Prompt: "Write a blog intro about marketing automation"

Output: "In today's fast-paced digital landscape, marketing automation has become an essential tool for businesses looking to streamline their operations and improve efficiency..."

With Brand Core:

Output: "Marketing automation promises to fix everything. Set it and forget it, they say. Run campaigns while you sleep. The reality? Most marketing automation becomes expensive email spam. Here's how to actually make it work."

Same topic. Completely different content. The difference is context, AI that knows your brand writes like your brand.

Part 2: Voice Guidelines—The Tactical Playbook

Brand Core provides the strategic foundation. Voice Guidelines translate that foundation into specific, actionable rules AI can follow.

The Voice Guidelines Framework

1. Sentence-Level Patterns

Document specific patterns that make your voice distinctive:

  • Sentence length: "Vary between 8-25 words. Avoid sentences over 30 words. Use fragments intentionally for emphasis."

  • Paragraph structure: "Lead with the point. Never bury the insight. First sentence should be quotable."

  • Punctuation habits: "Use em dashes for asides—like this. Colons for lists. Avoid semicolons; they feel academic."

2. Vocabulary Rules

Create a brand dictionary:

Use This

Not This

Why

Build

Leverage

"Leverage" is corporate jargon

Team

Resources

People aren't resources

Simple

User-friendly

"User-friendly" is overused

Works

Is effective

Show, don't tell

Start

Commence

Conversation, not contracts

3. Opening & Closing Patterns

Most AI content sounds generic because openings and closings default to templates. Document your alternatives:

Avoid these openings:

  • "In today's [adjective] [noun]..."

  • "Are you looking to [verb] your [noun]?"

  • "When it comes to [topic]..."

  • "[Topic] is more important than ever..."

Use these patterns instead:

  • Direct challenge: "Most [topic] advice is wrong."

  • Specific scenario: "You've spent $50K on ads with nothing to show for it."

  • Counterintuitive claim: "[Thing everyone believes] is actually hurting you."

  • Story hook: "Last Tuesday, our CEO deleted our marketing automation."

4. Format Preferences by Content Type

Different content types require different voice applications:

Content Type

Formality

Length

Structure

Voice Notes

Blog posts

Conversational

1,500-3,000 words

TL;DR → Sections → FAQ

Can be opinionated

Email sequences

Warm, direct

150-300 words

One idea per email

Personal pronouns heavy

Social posts

Punchy, confident

Platform-specific

Hook → Value → CTA

Permission to be bold

Website copy

Confident, clear

Scannable

Headlines carry load

Benefits over features

Documentation

Helpful, precise

As needed

Task-oriented

Friendly but accurate

Training AI on Voice Guidelines

Voice guidelines work best when you provide examples, not just rules. For each guideline, include:

The Rule: "We never use passive voice in headlines."

Bad Example: "Marketing Results Can Be Improved With This Tool"

Good Example: "This Tool Triples Your Marketing Results"

Why: Active voice is more direct, more confident, and easier to scan.

AI learns better from patterns than from instructions. Show it what good looks like, and it will pattern-match more effectively than if you just tell it what to do.

Part 3: Systematic Review—The Quality Gate

Even with Brand Core and Voice Guidelines, AI output requires human review.

But "review" doesn't mean "rewrite from scratch." Systematic review means having a consistent process that catches voice drift efficiently.

The Three-Pass Review Framework

Pass 1: Voice Check (2 minutes)

Read the first two paragraphs out loud. Ask:

  • Does this sound like us?

  • Would I share this without embarrassment?

  • Is there any phrase that could appear on a competitor's site unchanged?

If the answer to any is wrong, stop and provide AI with specific feedback before continuing.

Pass 2: Structure Check (3 minutes)

Scan the full piece for:

  • Opening: Does it hook immediately or throat-clear?

  • Flow: Does each section earn the next?

  • Ending: Does it land or just stop?

  • Formatting: Does it match our style guide?

Mark sections that need work rather than editing immediately.

Pass 3: Detail Polish (5-10 minutes)

Now edit:

  • Replace generic phrases with specific alternatives

  • Add examples from your company's actual experience

  • Inject personality where the content feels flat

  • Cut anything that doesn't earn its space

The Review Checklist

Use this checklist for every piece of AI content:

Voice Alignment

  • [ ] Could only come from our brand (not generic)

  • [ ] Matches the appropriate formality level

  • [ ] Uses our vocabulary, not corporate defaults

  • [ ] Takes positions rather than hedging

Quality Standards

  • [ ] Opening hooks within first 50 words

  • [ ] Every section has a clear point

  • [ ] No paragraph exceeds 4 sentences

  • [ ] Ends with purpose, not just stopping

Accuracy & Authenticity

  • [ ] All facts verified (AI hallucinates)

  • [ ] Statistics have sources

  • [ ] Examples are real (or clearly hypothetical)

  • [ ] No claims we can't support

Building Voice Consistency Metrics

Track voice alignment over time:

  • First-draft usability rate: What percentage of AI content is usable with minimal edits?

  • Voice deviation incidents: How often does AI drift into generic territory?

  • Edit time per piece: Is it decreasing as the system improves?

Teams using systematic brand voice training report achieving 95% usable content on first drafts. That's the benchmark to aim for.

Part 4: Iteration—The Compounding Advantage

The fourth component transforms a one-time setup into a self-improving system. Every piece of content you create makes the next piece better.

The Feedback Loop

When you edit AI content to match your voice, that edit becomes training data. Capture:

  1. What the AI produced (the original output)

  2. What you changed (the edited version)

  3. Why you changed it (the principle behind the edit)

Over time, these captured edits become additional Voice Guidelines that refine AI output.

Library Storage: Building Brand Memory

Every published piece should be stored in a content library that AI can reference. This creates:

Stylistic precedent: AI can see how you've handled similar topics before.

Vocabulary patterns: AI learns which words and phrases you actually use, not just what you say you prefer.

Structural templates: AI understands how you organize different content types.

The more content in your library, the better AI matches your voice.

This is the compounding advantage generic tools can't offer, a flywheel where every piece of content makes future content better.

Continuous Improvement Cycle

Timeframe

Action

Purpose

Weekly

Review voice consistency in published content

Catch drift early

Monthly

Update Voice Guidelines based on edits

Formalize learnings

Quarterly

Audit Brand Core for accuracy

Ensure foundation stays current

Ongoing

Add successful content to library

Build AI's reference base

The Averi Implementation: How It Actually Works

This Brand Voice System sounds great in theory. But implementing it with generic AI tools requires significant manual overhead, maintaining separate documents, copying context into every prompt, building your own review workflows.

Averi's content engine implements this system natively, automating what would otherwise require hours of manual coordination.

Phase 1: Brand Core Capture

When you onboard to Averi, the system scrapes your website to automatically learn:

  • Your business, products, and positioning

  • Your voice patterns from existing content

  • Your vocabulary and messaging themes

You review and refine what Averi learned, then confirm. The Brand Core persists across every interaction, you're not re-explaining your brand each session.

Phase 2: Voice Guidelines Integration

Averi applies voice guidelines to every draft:

In the Discuss Phase: Averi asks clarifying questions to understand context—who's this for, what's the goal, what angle should we take. It learns detail-questions specific to each asset type (blog post vs. LinkedIn post vs. email).

In the Draft Phase: AI generates with your Brand Core context loaded, applying structural preferences and vocabulary rules automatically.

In the Edit Phase: You refine in an editing canvas where you can highlight any section and ask Averi to rewrite with specific guidance: "Make this more direct" or "This sounds too corporate, punch it up."

Phase 3: Systematic Review Built In

Every piece created in Averi goes through a review workflow:

  • Comments and tagging for team collaboration

  • Version history tracking changes

The review process isn't separate from creation, it's integrated into the same canvas.

Phase 4: Library Compounding

Published content saves to your Averi Content Engine, training the AI on:

  • Your actual published voice (not just guidelines)

  • Successful content patterns

  • Topic coverage and internal linking opportunities

Each piece strengthens the next. The system literally gets better at matching your brand with every article you create.

Phase 5: Proactive Optimization

Averi gets stronger and smarter as you go.

It utilizes every piece of content you publish to naturally build content clusters in all future content. Analytics are tracked, keyword trends are reviewed and competitor content is analyzed so that Averi can proactively recommend and queue future content for you to create.

This is what closes the loop to your engine, so your strategy & results compound over time.

The Difference This Makes

Generic AI (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.):

  • Starts from zero every session

  • Requires manual context injection

  • No memory between conversations

  • Voice consistency depends entirely on your prompting

Averi's Brand Voice System:

  • Brand Core loads automatically

  • Voice guidelines applied by default

  • Library builds compound knowledge

  • AI genuinely improves at your voice over time

The output difference is stark. Content that sounds like your brand, not like AI, not like a committee, not like content that could belong to anyone.

Get Started With Averi →

Practical Implementation: Start Here

You don't need Averi to implement a Brand Voice System (though it certainly helps). Here's how to start with whatever tools you have:

Week 1: Document Your Brand Core

Create a single document with:

  1. Company positioning statement (25 words)

  2. Three ICPs with specific details

  3. Five voice attributes with definitions and examples

  4. Ten vocabulary rules (use this, not that)

  5. Five example paragraphs that capture your voice perfectly

This document becomes your context injection for every AI prompt.

Week 2: Establish Voice Guidelines

Build a tactical playbook:

  1. Opening patterns you love (with examples)

  2. Openings to avoid (with examples of what not to do)

  3. Format templates for each content type

  4. Section-by-section guidelines for your most common content

Week 3: Create Your Review Process

Define your quality gate:

  1. Who reviews AI content before publishing?

  2. What checklist do they use?

  3. How do you capture learnings from edits?

  4. Where do you store examples of good voice?

Week 4: Build Your Iteration System

Close the feedback loop:

  1. Create a content library (even a Google Drive folder works)

  2. Track voice consistency metrics

  3. Schedule monthly Voice Guidelines updates

  4. Document successful patterns for reuse

The Prompt Template

Until you have a dedicated system, use this template for every AI content request:

[BRAND CONTEXT]
Company: [Who you are in 25 words]
Audience: [Specific ICP for this piece]
Voice: [3-5 attributes with brief definitions]
Avoid: [Words, phrases, and patterns to skip]

[CONTENT BRIEF]
Type: [Blog post, email, social, etc.]
Goal: [What should the reader do/think/feel?]
Key points: [What must be included]
Length: [Target word count]

[VOICE EXAMPLES]
This sounds like us:
"[Example paragraph in your voice]"

This doesn't sound like us:
"[Example of generic content to avoid]"

[REQUEST]
Write [content type] about [topic] for [audience]

It's not as seamless as a dedicated system, but it dramatically outperforms prompting cold.

The Voice Anti-Patterns: What to Watch For

Even with a system, AI content can drift. Watch for these warning signs:

1. The Hedging Epidemic

Symptom: Every claim comes with qualifiers.

"This approach might potentially help some businesses achieve somewhat better results in certain situations."

Fix: Delete the hedges. Make direct claims. If you're not confident enough to state something directly, either verify it or cut it.

2. The Thesaurus Plague

Symptom: Unnecessarily complex vocabulary where simple words work better.

"Leverage our comprehensive solution to optimize your operational efficiency."

Fix: Enforce simple vocabulary rules. "Use" not "leverage." "Improve" not "optimize." "Run" not "operational efficiency."

3. The Preamble Problem

Symptom: Content that takes forever to get to the point.

"In today's rapidly evolving digital landscape, businesses of all sizes are increasingly recognizing the important role that marketing plays in their overall success. As we navigate these changes, it's crucial to understand..."

Fix: Delete everything before the first interesting sentence. Start where the content actually begins.

4. The Generic Conclusion

Symptom: Endings that say nothing.

"By following these steps, you can improve your marketing and achieve better results for your business."

Fix: End with specificity. What exact next step should they take? What specific outcome should they expect?

5. The Committee Voice

Symptom: Content that sounds like it was written to offend no one.

"There are many valid perspectives on this topic, and it's important to consider all viewpoints when making your decision."

Fix: Take a position. Be willing to be wrong but unwilling to be boring. The best brands have opinions.

Measuring Voice Quality

How do you know if your Brand Voice System is working?

Quantitative Metrics

First-Draft Usability Rate Track what percentage of AI drafts are publishable with minor edits only (under 10 minutes of work). Target: 80%+.

Voice Deviation Rate Track how often content requires major voice correction (complete rewrites, fundamental tone shifts). Target: Under 10%.

Time to Publish Track average time from content request to published piece. Should decrease as system improves.

Consistency Score If you have multiple writers (AI or human), have editors rate voice consistency across pieces on a 1-5 scale. Target: 4+ average.

Qualitative Indicators

The Blindfold Test Show team members content without any branding. Can they identify it as yours? If not, voice isn't distinctive enough.

The Competitor Swap Test Could this content appear on a competitor's site unchanged? If yes, it's too generic.

The Reading Aloud Test Read content out loud. Does it sound like how you'd actually talk about this topic? Or does it sound like a press release?

The Share Test Would you share this content on your personal LinkedIn without feeling embarrassed? If you'd hesitate, the quality isn't there.

The Choice Ahead

We stand at a fork in content marketing.

Path 1: Use AI as a generic content generator. Pump out forgettable articles that blur into the noise. Race to the bottom on volume while quality erodes and audiences tune out.

Path 2: Use AI as a brand-trained writing partner. Build a system that compounds—where every piece makes the next piece better, where voice consistency improves over time, where content genuinely reflects your brand's perspective.

The tools are the same. The difference is the system.

Those of us who have followed the AI evangelists' preachings are all starting to realize something concerning… AI can be incredible, but outputs all start looking the same.

Feeds and content hubs across the internet are filled with the same post wearing interchangeable names while the raw, human feeling of the web washes away.

The answer is obvious.

In a world awash with AI content, it is the unique ability of the human mind to bring taste, perspective, and genuine originality that becomes invaluable. Taste—not pattern recognition or algorithmic blending, but developed through experience—becomes the difference maker.

The Brand Voice System doesn't replace that human element. It amplifies it.

It takes your distinctive perspective and scales it across every piece of content, without losing the soul that makes your brand memorable.

AI has given every marketer the same capabilities. What separates the signal from the noise is the system behind the tool.

Build the system. Own the voice. Stand out.

Related Resources

Brand Voice & AI Content Quality

AI Content Creation & Quality

Content Engine & Workflow

Thought Leadership & Content Strategy

Founder & Solo Marketer Guides

LLM Optimization & AI Visibility

Definitions & Key Concepts

Continue Reading

The latest handpicked blog articles

Don't Feed the Algorithm

“Top 3 tech + AI newsletters in the country. Always sharp, always actionable.”

"Genuinely my favorite newsletter in tech. No fluff, no cheesy ads, just great content."

“Clear, practical, and on-point. Helps me keep up without drowning in noise.”

Don't Feed the Algorithm

“Top 3 tech + AI newsletters in the country. Always sharp, always actionable.”

"Genuinely my favorite newsletter in tech. No fluff, no cheesy ads, just great content."

“Clear, practical, and on-point. Helps me keep up without drowning in noise.”

User-Generated Content & Authenticity in the Age of AI

Zach Chmael

Head of Marketing

8 minutes

In This Article

Generic tools produce generic output because they lack brand context. When you prompt ChatGPT cold, you're asking a tool trained on the entire internet to somehow channel your specific brand voice. That's like asking a stranger to write your wedding toast based on a one-sentence description of your personality.

Don’t Feed the Algorithm

The algorithm never sleeps, but you don’t have to feed it — Join our weekly newsletter for real insights on AI, human creativity & marketing execution.

AI Content That Doesn't Sound Like AI: The Brand Voice System That Actually Works

The Fear Is Justified (But Solvable)

Let's be honest about the elephant in every marketing meeting: AI content often sounds f*cking terrible.

You know the symptoms… bland corporate-speak, endless hedging phrases, that weirdly formal tone that sounds like a committee wrote it by consensus. The content that technically says something but somehow says nothing. The blog posts that could belong to literally any company in your space.

This fear isn't irrational. The data backs it up:

The marketing world is drowning in AI slop.

Content hubs across the internet are filled with the same posts wearing interchangeable brand names while the raw, human feeling of the web washes away. Feed any ten AI tools the same prompt, and you'll get ten variations of the same generic response.

But I'm here to tell you the problem isn't AI itself, it's how AI is being used.

Generic tools produce generic output because they lack brand context. When you prompt ChatGPT cold, you're asking a tool trained on the entire internet to somehow channel your specific brand voice. That's like asking a stranger to write your wedding toast based on a one-sentence description of your personality.

The companies producing distinctive AI content aren't using different AI. They're using a different system.

Why Most AI Content Sounds the Same

Before we fix the problem, we need to understand it. AI content sounds generic for three specific, addressable reasons:

1. Zero Persistent Context

Most AI interactions start from a blank slate. Every time you open ChatGPT or Claude, you're beginning a new conversation with a tool that knows nothing about your brand, your audience, your voice, or your positioning.

Even when building a project, things are often lost between days and different conversations.

You compensate by adding context to every prompt: "Write in a friendly but professional tone for a B2B SaaS audience that values simplicity..."

But this manual context injection is:

  • Inconsistent: Different team members add different context (or forget entirely)

  • Incomplete: You can't capture brand voice nuance in a prompt prefix

  • Exhausting: Re-explaining your brand to AI for every piece of content

So you're left with content that's technically correct but emotionally empty. It sounds like AI because AI is filling in the blanks with generic defaults.

2. No Brand Memory

Even when you nail the prompt once, that success doesn't carry forward.

Generic AI tools have no mechanism to remember what worked, learn from your edits, or compound their understanding of your brand over time.

You spend 30 minutes crafting the perfect blog post, editing the voice until it sounds right. Then next week, you start over. The AI learned nothing from your refinements. You're in a perpetual loop of teaching the same lessons.

This is the opposite of how human writers develop brand fluency.

A good human writer gets better at your voice with every piece. Generic AI resets to zero every session.

3. Trained on Everything = Expert in Nothing

Large language models are trained on the entire internet, which means they're trained on millions of examples of bland corporate content.

When you ask AI to write marketing copy without specific guidance, it defaults to the statistical average of all marketing copy it's ever seen.

And the statistical average of all marketing copy is... forgettable.

AI tools naturally drift toward safe, generic phrasing because that's what dominates their training data. They avoid the distinctive, the opinionated, the specific… exactly the qualities that make content memorable.

The Brand Voice System: A Four-Part Framework

Producing distinctive AI content requires moving from "tool" thinking to "system" thinking.

Instead of asking "how do I write a better prompt?", ask "how do I build a workflow that consistently produces on-brand content?"

The answer is a Brand Voice System with four interconnected components:


Let's break down each component.

Part 1: Brand Core—Your AI's Foundation

The Brand Core is everything AI needs to understand your brand before it writes a single word. This isn't a prompt, it's a persistent knowledge base that contextualizes every interaction.

What Goes Into Brand Core

Company Foundation

  • What you do (in 25 words or less)

  • Who you serve (specific ICPs, not "businesses")

  • Your core value proposition

  • What makes you different from alternatives

  • Your origin story and key milestones

Voice & Personality

  • 3-5 voice attributes with definitions (not just words—explanations)

  • What you sound like (with examples)

  • What you don't sound like (equally important)

  • Vocabulary to use and avoid

  • Sentence structure preferences

  • Formality level by content type

Positioning & Messaging

  • Category you compete in

  • Key competitors and how you differ

  • Core messaging pillars

  • Proof points and supporting evidence

  • Common objections and responses

Audience Intelligence

  • ICP details: roles, challenges, goals, fears

  • How your audience talks about their problems

  • What language resonates vs. falls flat

  • Stage-specific messaging (awareness → consideration → decision)

Brand Core Example: Voice Attributes

Don't just list adjectives. Define them with examples:

Attribute

Definition

Sounds Like

Doesn't Sound Like

Confident

We speak with authority earned through experience. No hedging or excessive caveats.

"Here's what works."

"This might possibly help some people in certain situations..."

Direct

We get to the point. No throat-clearing, no preamble, no corporate padding.

"Marketing attribution is broken. Here's why."

"In today's ever-evolving marketing landscape, it's becoming increasingly important to consider..."

Conversational

We write like smart people talk. Complex ideas in accessible language.

"Let's break this down."

"One must endeavor to comprehend the multifaceted nature of..."

Opinionated

We take positions. We're willing to be wrong but unwilling to be boring.

"Most SEO advice is outdated. Here's what actually moves the needle."

"There are many perspectives on SEO, and all have merit."

Why Brand Core Changes Everything

When AI has persistent access to Brand Core, the dynamic shifts fundamentally:

Without Brand Core:

Prompt: "Write a blog intro about marketing automation"

Output: "In today's fast-paced digital landscape, marketing automation has become an essential tool for businesses looking to streamline their operations and improve efficiency..."

With Brand Core:

Output: "Marketing automation promises to fix everything. Set it and forget it, they say. Run campaigns while you sleep. The reality? Most marketing automation becomes expensive email spam. Here's how to actually make it work."

Same topic. Completely different content. The difference is context, AI that knows your brand writes like your brand.

Part 2: Voice Guidelines—The Tactical Playbook

Brand Core provides the strategic foundation. Voice Guidelines translate that foundation into specific, actionable rules AI can follow.

The Voice Guidelines Framework

1. Sentence-Level Patterns

Document specific patterns that make your voice distinctive:

  • Sentence length: "Vary between 8-25 words. Avoid sentences over 30 words. Use fragments intentionally for emphasis."

  • Paragraph structure: "Lead with the point. Never bury the insight. First sentence should be quotable."

  • Punctuation habits: "Use em dashes for asides—like this. Colons for lists. Avoid semicolons; they feel academic."

2. Vocabulary Rules

Create a brand dictionary:

Use This

Not This

Why

Build

Leverage

"Leverage" is corporate jargon

Team

Resources

People aren't resources

Simple

User-friendly

"User-friendly" is overused

Works

Is effective

Show, don't tell

Start

Commence

Conversation, not contracts

3. Opening & Closing Patterns

Most AI content sounds generic because openings and closings default to templates. Document your alternatives:

Avoid these openings:

  • "In today's [adjective] [noun]..."

  • "Are you looking to [verb] your [noun]?"

  • "When it comes to [topic]..."

  • "[Topic] is more important than ever..."

Use these patterns instead:

  • Direct challenge: "Most [topic] advice is wrong."

  • Specific scenario: "You've spent $50K on ads with nothing to show for it."

  • Counterintuitive claim: "[Thing everyone believes] is actually hurting you."

  • Story hook: "Last Tuesday, our CEO deleted our marketing automation."

4. Format Preferences by Content Type

Different content types require different voice applications:

Content Type

Formality

Length

Structure

Voice Notes

Blog posts

Conversational

1,500-3,000 words

TL;DR → Sections → FAQ

Can be opinionated

Email sequences

Warm, direct

150-300 words

One idea per email

Personal pronouns heavy

Social posts

Punchy, confident

Platform-specific

Hook → Value → CTA

Permission to be bold

Website copy

Confident, clear

Scannable

Headlines carry load

Benefits over features

Documentation

Helpful, precise

As needed

Task-oriented

Friendly but accurate

Training AI on Voice Guidelines

Voice guidelines work best when you provide examples, not just rules. For each guideline, include:

The Rule: "We never use passive voice in headlines."

Bad Example: "Marketing Results Can Be Improved With This Tool"

Good Example: "This Tool Triples Your Marketing Results"

Why: Active voice is more direct, more confident, and easier to scan.

AI learns better from patterns than from instructions. Show it what good looks like, and it will pattern-match more effectively than if you just tell it what to do.

Part 3: Systematic Review—The Quality Gate

Even with Brand Core and Voice Guidelines, AI output requires human review.

But "review" doesn't mean "rewrite from scratch." Systematic review means having a consistent process that catches voice drift efficiently.

The Three-Pass Review Framework

Pass 1: Voice Check (2 minutes)

Read the first two paragraphs out loud. Ask:

  • Does this sound like us?

  • Would I share this without embarrassment?

  • Is there any phrase that could appear on a competitor's site unchanged?

If the answer to any is wrong, stop and provide AI with specific feedback before continuing.

Pass 2: Structure Check (3 minutes)

Scan the full piece for:

  • Opening: Does it hook immediately or throat-clear?

  • Flow: Does each section earn the next?

  • Ending: Does it land or just stop?

  • Formatting: Does it match our style guide?

Mark sections that need work rather than editing immediately.

Pass 3: Detail Polish (5-10 minutes)

Now edit:

  • Replace generic phrases with specific alternatives

  • Add examples from your company's actual experience

  • Inject personality where the content feels flat

  • Cut anything that doesn't earn its space

The Review Checklist

Use this checklist for every piece of AI content:

Voice Alignment

  • [ ] Could only come from our brand (not generic)

  • [ ] Matches the appropriate formality level

  • [ ] Uses our vocabulary, not corporate defaults

  • [ ] Takes positions rather than hedging

Quality Standards

  • [ ] Opening hooks within first 50 words

  • [ ] Every section has a clear point

  • [ ] No paragraph exceeds 4 sentences

  • [ ] Ends with purpose, not just stopping

Accuracy & Authenticity

  • [ ] All facts verified (AI hallucinates)

  • [ ] Statistics have sources

  • [ ] Examples are real (or clearly hypothetical)

  • [ ] No claims we can't support

Building Voice Consistency Metrics

Track voice alignment over time:

  • First-draft usability rate: What percentage of AI content is usable with minimal edits?

  • Voice deviation incidents: How often does AI drift into generic territory?

  • Edit time per piece: Is it decreasing as the system improves?

Teams using systematic brand voice training report achieving 95% usable content on first drafts. That's the benchmark to aim for.

Part 4: Iteration—The Compounding Advantage

The fourth component transforms a one-time setup into a self-improving system. Every piece of content you create makes the next piece better.

The Feedback Loop

When you edit AI content to match your voice, that edit becomes training data. Capture:

  1. What the AI produced (the original output)

  2. What you changed (the edited version)

  3. Why you changed it (the principle behind the edit)

Over time, these captured edits become additional Voice Guidelines that refine AI output.

Library Storage: Building Brand Memory

Every published piece should be stored in a content library that AI can reference. This creates:

Stylistic precedent: AI can see how you've handled similar topics before.

Vocabulary patterns: AI learns which words and phrases you actually use, not just what you say you prefer.

Structural templates: AI understands how you organize different content types.

The more content in your library, the better AI matches your voice.

This is the compounding advantage generic tools can't offer, a flywheel where every piece of content makes future content better.

Continuous Improvement Cycle

Timeframe

Action

Purpose

Weekly

Review voice consistency in published content

Catch drift early

Monthly

Update Voice Guidelines based on edits

Formalize learnings

Quarterly

Audit Brand Core for accuracy

Ensure foundation stays current

Ongoing

Add successful content to library

Build AI's reference base

The Averi Implementation: How It Actually Works

This Brand Voice System sounds great in theory. But implementing it with generic AI tools requires significant manual overhead, maintaining separate documents, copying context into every prompt, building your own review workflows.

Averi's content engine implements this system natively, automating what would otherwise require hours of manual coordination.

Phase 1: Brand Core Capture

When you onboard to Averi, the system scrapes your website to automatically learn:

  • Your business, products, and positioning

  • Your voice patterns from existing content

  • Your vocabulary and messaging themes

You review and refine what Averi learned, then confirm. The Brand Core persists across every interaction, you're not re-explaining your brand each session.

Phase 2: Voice Guidelines Integration

Averi applies voice guidelines to every draft:

In the Discuss Phase: Averi asks clarifying questions to understand context—who's this for, what's the goal, what angle should we take. It learns detail-questions specific to each asset type (blog post vs. LinkedIn post vs. email).

In the Draft Phase: AI generates with your Brand Core context loaded, applying structural preferences and vocabulary rules automatically.

In the Edit Phase: You refine in an editing canvas where you can highlight any section and ask Averi to rewrite with specific guidance: "Make this more direct" or "This sounds too corporate, punch it up."

Phase 3: Systematic Review Built In

Every piece created in Averi goes through a review workflow:

  • Comments and tagging for team collaboration

  • Version history tracking changes

The review process isn't separate from creation, it's integrated into the same canvas.

Phase 4: Library Compounding

Published content saves to your Averi Content Engine, training the AI on:

  • Your actual published voice (not just guidelines)

  • Successful content patterns

  • Topic coverage and internal linking opportunities

Each piece strengthens the next. The system literally gets better at matching your brand with every article you create.

Phase 5: Proactive Optimization

Averi gets stronger and smarter as you go.

It utilizes every piece of content you publish to naturally build content clusters in all future content. Analytics are tracked, keyword trends are reviewed and competitor content is analyzed so that Averi can proactively recommend and queue future content for you to create.

This is what closes the loop to your engine, so your strategy & results compound over time.

The Difference This Makes

Generic AI (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.):

  • Starts from zero every session

  • Requires manual context injection

  • No memory between conversations

  • Voice consistency depends entirely on your prompting

Averi's Brand Voice System:

  • Brand Core loads automatically

  • Voice guidelines applied by default

  • Library builds compound knowledge

  • AI genuinely improves at your voice over time

The output difference is stark. Content that sounds like your brand, not like AI, not like a committee, not like content that could belong to anyone.

Get Started With Averi →

Practical Implementation: Start Here

You don't need Averi to implement a Brand Voice System (though it certainly helps). Here's how to start with whatever tools you have:

Week 1: Document Your Brand Core

Create a single document with:

  1. Company positioning statement (25 words)

  2. Three ICPs with specific details

  3. Five voice attributes with definitions and examples

  4. Ten vocabulary rules (use this, not that)

  5. Five example paragraphs that capture your voice perfectly

This document becomes your context injection for every AI prompt.

Week 2: Establish Voice Guidelines

Build a tactical playbook:

  1. Opening patterns you love (with examples)

  2. Openings to avoid (with examples of what not to do)

  3. Format templates for each content type

  4. Section-by-section guidelines for your most common content

Week 3: Create Your Review Process

Define your quality gate:

  1. Who reviews AI content before publishing?

  2. What checklist do they use?

  3. How do you capture learnings from edits?

  4. Where do you store examples of good voice?

Week 4: Build Your Iteration System

Close the feedback loop:

  1. Create a content library (even a Google Drive folder works)

  2. Track voice consistency metrics

  3. Schedule monthly Voice Guidelines updates

  4. Document successful patterns for reuse

The Prompt Template

Until you have a dedicated system, use this template for every AI content request:

[BRAND CONTEXT]
Company: [Who you are in 25 words]
Audience: [Specific ICP for this piece]
Voice: [3-5 attributes with brief definitions]
Avoid: [Words, phrases, and patterns to skip]

[CONTENT BRIEF]
Type: [Blog post, email, social, etc.]
Goal: [What should the reader do/think/feel?]
Key points: [What must be included]
Length: [Target word count]

[VOICE EXAMPLES]
This sounds like us:
"[Example paragraph in your voice]"

This doesn't sound like us:
"[Example of generic content to avoid]"

[REQUEST]
Write [content type] about [topic] for [audience]

It's not as seamless as a dedicated system, but it dramatically outperforms prompting cold.

The Voice Anti-Patterns: What to Watch For

Even with a system, AI content can drift. Watch for these warning signs:

1. The Hedging Epidemic

Symptom: Every claim comes with qualifiers.

"This approach might potentially help some businesses achieve somewhat better results in certain situations."

Fix: Delete the hedges. Make direct claims. If you're not confident enough to state something directly, either verify it or cut it.

2. The Thesaurus Plague

Symptom: Unnecessarily complex vocabulary where simple words work better.

"Leverage our comprehensive solution to optimize your operational efficiency."

Fix: Enforce simple vocabulary rules. "Use" not "leverage." "Improve" not "optimize." "Run" not "operational efficiency."

3. The Preamble Problem

Symptom: Content that takes forever to get to the point.

"In today's rapidly evolving digital landscape, businesses of all sizes are increasingly recognizing the important role that marketing plays in their overall success. As we navigate these changes, it's crucial to understand..."

Fix: Delete everything before the first interesting sentence. Start where the content actually begins.

4. The Generic Conclusion

Symptom: Endings that say nothing.

"By following these steps, you can improve your marketing and achieve better results for your business."

Fix: End with specificity. What exact next step should they take? What specific outcome should they expect?

5. The Committee Voice

Symptom: Content that sounds like it was written to offend no one.

"There are many valid perspectives on this topic, and it's important to consider all viewpoints when making your decision."

Fix: Take a position. Be willing to be wrong but unwilling to be boring. The best brands have opinions.

Measuring Voice Quality

How do you know if your Brand Voice System is working?

Quantitative Metrics

First-Draft Usability Rate Track what percentage of AI drafts are publishable with minor edits only (under 10 minutes of work). Target: 80%+.

Voice Deviation Rate Track how often content requires major voice correction (complete rewrites, fundamental tone shifts). Target: Under 10%.

Time to Publish Track average time from content request to published piece. Should decrease as system improves.

Consistency Score If you have multiple writers (AI or human), have editors rate voice consistency across pieces on a 1-5 scale. Target: 4+ average.

Qualitative Indicators

The Blindfold Test Show team members content without any branding. Can they identify it as yours? If not, voice isn't distinctive enough.

The Competitor Swap Test Could this content appear on a competitor's site unchanged? If yes, it's too generic.

The Reading Aloud Test Read content out loud. Does it sound like how you'd actually talk about this topic? Or does it sound like a press release?

The Share Test Would you share this content on your personal LinkedIn without feeling embarrassed? If you'd hesitate, the quality isn't there.

The Choice Ahead

We stand at a fork in content marketing.

Path 1: Use AI as a generic content generator. Pump out forgettable articles that blur into the noise. Race to the bottom on volume while quality erodes and audiences tune out.

Path 2: Use AI as a brand-trained writing partner. Build a system that compounds—where every piece makes the next piece better, where voice consistency improves over time, where content genuinely reflects your brand's perspective.

The tools are the same. The difference is the system.

Those of us who have followed the AI evangelists' preachings are all starting to realize something concerning… AI can be incredible, but outputs all start looking the same.

Feeds and content hubs across the internet are filled with the same post wearing interchangeable names while the raw, human feeling of the web washes away.

The answer is obvious.

In a world awash with AI content, it is the unique ability of the human mind to bring taste, perspective, and genuine originality that becomes invaluable. Taste—not pattern recognition or algorithmic blending, but developed through experience—becomes the difference maker.

The Brand Voice System doesn't replace that human element. It amplifies it.

It takes your distinctive perspective and scales it across every piece of content, without losing the soul that makes your brand memorable.

AI has given every marketer the same capabilities. What separates the signal from the noise is the system behind the tool.

Build the system. Own the voice. Stand out.

Related Resources

Brand Voice & AI Content Quality

AI Content Creation & Quality

Content Engine & Workflow

Thought Leadership & Content Strategy

Founder & Solo Marketer Guides

LLM Optimization & AI Visibility

Definitions & Key Concepts

FAQs

The framework applies universally, but Voice Guidelines should vary by content type. A LinkedIn post has different voice requirements than a technical white paper. Build format-specific guidelines within your overall system. Most teams find that once they nail voice for one content type, extending to others becomes much easier—the core principles transfer, only the tactical application changes.

Does this work for all content types?

Tools like Jasper offer brand voice training, but typically as a feature within a broader content generation tool. Jasper's brand voice produces strong content after proper setup. The difference with a comprehensive Brand Voice System is the integration: Brand Core that informs strategy (not just tone), Voice Guidelines that cover structure and format (not just word choice), review workflows built into the creation process, and library compounding that improves over time. Brand voice features help; brand voice systems transform.

How does this compare to Jasper's brand voice feature?

Common causes include: Brand Core that's too vague (add more specific examples), Voice Guidelines without enough patterns (show more, tell less), insufficient library content for AI reference, or skipping the review process. Diagnose by checking where in the system the breakdown occurs. Usually, adding more concrete examples at the Brand Core and Voice Guidelines level solves persistent generic output.

What if AI content still sounds generic after implementing this system?

There's no legal requirement in most jurisdictions, but transparency builds trust. More importantly, the goal isn't to hide AI use—it's to produce content good enough that disclosure doesn't matter. If your AI content is distinctive, valuable, and genuinely reflects your brand perspective, the method of production is secondary. Focus on quality, not concealment.

Should I disclose when content is AI-assisted?

Initial Brand Core and Voice Guidelines documentation takes 4-8 hours of focused work. The system then improves continuously through use. Most teams see significant voice improvement within 2-4 weeks of consistent use as the library builds and feedback loops refine guidelines. The compounding effect means the system gets better over time, unlike generic AI which starts from zero every session.

How long does it take to train AI on brand voice?

Yes, but not out of the box. Generic AI produces generic output because it lacks brand context. With persistent Brand Core, documented Voice Guidelines, systematic review, and iterative improvement, AI can produce content that genuinely matches brand voice. Teams using these systems report 95% usable content on first drafts. The difference isn't the AI model—it's the system around it.

Can AI really match a distinctive brand voice?

FAQs

How long does it take to see SEO results for B2B SaaS?

Expect 7 months to break-even on average, with meaningful traffic improvements typically appearing within 3-6 months. Link building results appear within 1-6 months. The key is consistency—companies that stop and start lose ground to those who execute continuously.

Is AI-generated content actually good for SEO?

62% of marketers report higher SERP rankings for AI-generated content—but only when properly edited and enhanced with human expertise. Pure AI content without human refinement often lacks the originality and depth that both readers and algorithms prefer.

Is AI-generated content actually good for SEO?

62% of marketers report higher SERP rankings for AI-generated content—but only when properly edited and enhanced with human expertise. Pure AI content without human refinement often lacks the originality and depth that both readers and algorithms prefer.

Is AI-generated content actually good for SEO?

62% of marketers report higher SERP rankings for AI-generated content—but only when properly edited and enhanced with human expertise. Pure AI content without human refinement often lacks the originality and depth that both readers and algorithms prefer.

Is AI-generated content actually good for SEO?

62% of marketers report higher SERP rankings for AI-generated content—but only when properly edited and enhanced with human expertise. Pure AI content without human refinement often lacks the originality and depth that both readers and algorithms prefer.

Is AI-generated content actually good for SEO?

62% of marketers report higher SERP rankings for AI-generated content—but only when properly edited and enhanced with human expertise. Pure AI content without human refinement often lacks the originality and depth that both readers and algorithms prefer.

Is AI-generated content actually good for SEO?

62% of marketers report higher SERP rankings for AI-generated content—but only when properly edited and enhanced with human expertise. Pure AI content without human refinement often lacks the originality and depth that both readers and algorithms prefer.

Is AI-generated content actually good for SEO?

62% of marketers report higher SERP rankings for AI-generated content—but only when properly edited and enhanced with human expertise. Pure AI content without human refinement often lacks the originality and depth that both readers and algorithms prefer.

TL;DR

  • 🤖 The generic AI content problem is real. 60% of marketers who use generative AI are concerned it could harm brand reputation due to bias, plagiarism, and values misalignment. The concern isn't paranoia—it's pattern recognition.

  • 📊 17% of search results are now AI-generated, and audiences are increasingly numb to formulaic content. 32% of consumers say AI is negatively disrupting the creator economy—up from 18% in 2023.

  • 🎯 The problem isn't AI—it's the workflow. Generic AI tools produce generic output because they lack persistent brand context. Every session starts from scratch, producing content that could belong to anyone.

  • The solution is a Brand Voice System: Brand Core → Voice Guidelines → Systematic Review → Iteration. This workflow transforms AI from a generic content generator into a brand-trained writing partner.

  • 🏆 Results speak: Teams using systematic brand voice training report 95% usable content on first drafts, saving hours of editing while maintaining distinctive voice.

Continue Reading

The latest handpicked blog articles

Don't Feed the Algorithm

“Top 3 tech + AI newsletters in the country. Always sharp, always actionable.”

"Genuinely my favorite newsletter in tech. No fluff, no cheesy ads, just great content."

“Clear, practical, and on-point. Helps me keep up without drowning in noise.”

Don't Feed the Algorithm

“Top 3 tech + AI newsletters in the country. Always sharp, always actionable.”

"Genuinely my favorite newsletter in tech. No fluff, no cheesy ads, just great content."

“Clear, practical, and on-point. Helps me keep up without drowning in noise.”