Jan 15, 2026
How to Execute a Content Strategy (Not Just Create One)

Zach Chmael
Head of Marketing
6 minutes

In This Article
This guide is about building that infrastructure, turning "content strategy" into "published content" without hiring an army or burning out your team.
Updated
Jan 15, 2026
Don’t Feed the Algorithm
The algorithm never sleeps, but you don’t have to feed it — Join our weekly newsletter for real insights on AI, human creativity & marketing execution.
TL;DR
📄 The problem isn't strategy. Most teams have content strategies—documented personas, topics, keywords. What they don't have is the capacity to execute.
📊 The numbers are stark. 61% of executives admit their firms struggle to bridge strategy and execution. 67% of well-formulated strategies fail due to poor execution. Strategy documents don't execute themselves.
⏰ Three bottlenecks kill execution: Time (content takes 15-25 hours per piece traditionally), Skills (quality content requires 10+ specialized capabilities), Coordination (handoffs and approvals where content goes to die).
🔧 You need infrastructure, not effort. The execution stack: embedded strategy, automated research, AI-accelerated creation, built-in quality control, direct publishing, feedback loops.
💰 Two models exist: Build the team (3+ hires, $150K-300K+ annually, 3-6 month timeline) or build the system (software investment, 5-10 hours weekly oversight, immediate capability).
⚙️ How Averi works: Strategy in (Brand Core learned automatically), research done (keywords, competitors, sources gathered), drafts produced (brand-aware, SEO-optimized), human refinement (collaborative editing canvas), quality built in (voice enforcement, optimization), published content out (direct to Webflow, Framer, WordPress).
⏱️ The time difference: Traditional = 15-25 hours per piece. With infrastructure = 2-4 hours per piece. Same quality. 5x the output capacity.
🎯 The real question: Do you have a strategy problem (unclear who, what, why) or an execution problem (know what to do, can't make it happen)? Most teams have execution problems.
How to Execute a Content Strategy (Not Just Create One)
You have a content strategy.
It's in a Google Doc somewhere. Maybe a Notion page. Perhaps it came from a consultant, an agency, or a strategy session with your team. It has personas.
It has topics. It has a content calendar. It might even have a competitive analysis.
And nothing is happening.
The document sits there… complete, professional, gathering digital dust. Meanwhile, your blog has four posts from eight months ago.
Your competitors are publishing weekly. Your target keywords are ranking for everyone except you.
You don't have a strategy problem. You have an execution problem. And you aren't alone.
Research from The Economist and PMI found that 61% of executives acknowledge their firms struggle to bridge the gap between strategy formulation and execution. In marketing specifically, Harvard Business Review research shows 67% of well-formulated strategies fail due to poor execution.
Your strategy document isn't failing because it's wrong. It's failing because execution requires infrastructure you don't have.
This guide is about building that infrastructure, turning "content strategy" into "published content" without hiring an army or burning out your team.

The Strategy-Execution Gap
Let's be honest about what's really happening.
Your content strategy probably looks something like this:
Target audience: Defined
Core topics: Identified
Keyword opportunities: Researched
Content types: Mapped to funnel stages
Publishing cadence: "2-4 posts per month"
Distribution channels: Listed
It's a perfectly reasonable strategy. It might even be a great strategy.
But here's what always happens next:
Week 1: "We need to start executing on this content strategy."
Week 2: Marketing lead is pulled into product launch prep.
Week 3: Someone starts an outline for the first blog post.
Week 4: The outline sits in drafts. Other priorities.
Week 5-8: Nothing happens.
Week 9: "We really need to get back to content."
Week 10: Repeat cycle.
Did I nail it? It's okay to admit it. We've all been there.
The Documented Strategy Illusion
There's a dangerous assumption baked into most content strategies: having the strategy means execution will follow.
It won't.
A Kaplan and Norton study found that less than 5% of employees have a basic understanding of company strategy. In smaller teams, awareness might be higher, but awareness isn't the problem.
The problem is that knowing what to do and having the capacity to do it are entirely different things.
Consider the gap between "publish 2-4 blog posts monthly" and actual execution:
Strategy Says | Execution Requires |
|---|---|
"Publish 2-4 posts/month" | 8-16+ hours of writing per month |
"Target these keywords" | Keyword research, competitive analysis, search intent mapping |
"Maintain brand voice" | Voice guidelines, editorial review, consistency checks |
"Optimize for SEO" | On-page optimization, meta tags, internal linking, schema |
"Distribute across channels" | Social posting, email integration, repurposing workflows |
That "simple" strategy of 2-4 posts per month requires 40-80 hours of work monthly.
For startups with 1-2 person marketing teams (or no dedicated marketing at all), that capacity doesn't exist.
The strategy isn't the constraint. Time is.

Why Execution Fails: The Three Bottlenecks
After working with hundreds of startups on content execution, the same three bottlenecks appear everywhere:
Bottleneck #1: Time
70% of marketers report that content creation remains their biggest operational challenge. Not strategy. Not ideas. The actual creation of content.
The mathematics are brutal. A comprehensive blog post takes 15-25 hours total across research, writing, editing, and design. Even using AI to accelerate drafting, you're still looking at 4-8 hours per quality piece after research, review, and refinement.
For a founder-led startup where the founder is also doing sales, product, fundraising, and operations? Those hours don't exist.
For a solo marketer handling demand gen, social, email, and events? Content creation is one of ten priorities, and rarely the most urgent.
The time bottleneck isn't about efficiency. It's about capacity.
You cannot create capacity by working harder. You create it by changing what work gets done, and by whom.
Bottleneck #2: Skills
Quality content requires multiple specialized skills:
Strategic skills:
Keyword research and opportunity identification
Competitive analysis
Search intent mapping
Topic clustering for authority building
Creation skills:
Research and fact-finding
Writing (in your brand voice)
Editing and quality control
SEO optimization
Technical skills:
CMS formatting and publishing
Image sourcing and optimization
Internal linking architecture
Meta tag and schema implementation
Distribution skills:
Social media adaptation
Email integration
Repurposing across formats
Very few individuals possess all these skills at a high level. Even fewer can apply them efficiently enough to produce quality content at scale.
The skills gap is a resource problem dressed as a capability problem.
Bottleneck #3: Coordination
Even when you have some time and some skills, execution breaks down at the handoffs.
Think about a typical content workflow:
Strategist identifies topic opportunity
Topic gets added to "content ideas" backlog
Writer (eventually) picks up the topic
Writer researches and drafts
Draft goes to editor for review
Revisions happen (maybe multiple rounds)
Final version goes to someone for publishing
Someone else handles distribution
Each handoff is a potential failure point. Each transition requires context transfer. Each step assumes someone is actively managing the process.
Research from Marketing Profs shows that only 19% of teams managed to increase content ROI last year, the rest struggled with exactly these coordination challenges.
Small teams can't afford project managers dedicated to content. So coordination becomes ad hoc, inconsistent, and fragile.
The Execution Stack: What You Actually Need
Bridging the strategy-execution gap requires infrastructure, not effort. Here's what that infrastructure looks like:
1. Strategic Foundation That Informs Every Piece
Your strategy can't live in a separate document. It needs to be embedded in every piece of content you create.
This means:
Brand context that every writer (human or AI) can access
ICP understanding that shapes tone, depth, and examples
Keyword targets connected to each content piece
Competitive positioning that ensures differentiation
When strategy lives separately from execution, every piece of content requires translation. When strategy is embedded in the execution process, content is automatically aligned.
2. Research and Planning Infrastructure
Before writing starts, you need:
Topic validation: Is this actually a keyword opportunity?
Search intent analysis: What does the searcher actually want?
Competitive review: What already ranks, and what's missing?
Source identification: What data, examples, and quotes will support this piece?
This research is often skipped because it takes time. But skipping it produces content that doesn't rank, doesn't differentiate, and doesn't connect.
The solution isn't "do more research." It's building systems that do research automatically and present it to creators in actionable form.
3. Creation Acceleration
Writing is the visible bottleneck, but it's actually several sub-bottlenecks:
Getting started: Blank page paralysis, unclear structure, uncertain direction
Maintaining momentum: Research interruptions, voice drift, losing thread
Finishing: Perfection paralysis, endless editing, unclear "done" criteria
Execution infrastructure needs to address all three:
Templates and structures that eliminate blank page paralysis
Pre-loaded context that prevents research interruptions
Clear quality standards that define "done"
AI tools help here, not by fully automating writing, but by producing first drafts that humans refine. AI-assisted workflows can reduce content creation time by 50% while maintaining quality through human oversight.
4. Quality Control Without Slowdown
Every piece needs review. But review cycles are where content goes to die.
The solution is building quality into the process rather than bolting it on at the end:
Brand voice enforcement during creation, not after
SEO optimization integrated into drafting, not as a separate pass
Fact verification with linked sources, not post-hoc checking
When quality happens during creation, review becomes confirmation rather than correction.
5. Publishing That Actually Happens
The final bottleneck: getting content from "done" to "live."
For many teams, this step involves:
Copying content into CMS
Reformatting for platform requirements
Adding meta information
Configuring internal links
Setting up tracking
Scheduling or publishing
Each step is friction. Each step is an opportunity for the content to stall.
Direct publishing, content flowing from creation tool to live website without manual intervention—eliminates this friction.
6. Feedback and Learning
Execution isn't just about production. It's about improvement.
You need:
Performance tracking: Which content is working?
Pattern recognition: What topics, formats, and approaches perform best?
Continuous optimization: How do insights inform future content?
Without feedback loops, you're producing in the dark. With them, each piece of content makes subsequent content better.

The Two Execution Models
There are fundamentally two ways to solve the execution problem:
Model 1: Build the Team
The traditional approach: hire specialists for each function.
You'd need:
Content strategist (strategy + research)
SEO specialist (keyword research + optimization)
Writer(s) (creation)
Editor (quality control)
Publishing/operations person (distribution + publishing)
The math:
2-3 full-time hires minimum
$150K-300K+ annual salary cost
3-6 months to hire and onboard
Ongoing management overhead
This works for funded companies with significant marketing budgets. For most startups, it's not viable.
Model 2: Build the System
The alternative: create infrastructure that multiplies limited resources.
You'd need:
AI-powered research and drafting
Brand context that persists across all content
Quality control built into creation
Direct publishing integration
Performance tracking and learning
The math:
Software investment (hundreds, not thousands monthly)
5-10 hours weekly of human oversight and refinement
Immediate capability (no hiring timeline)
Scales without proportional cost increase
This is the model that makes execution possible for small teams.

How Averi Closes the Gap
Averi's Content Engine is built specifically to solve the strategy-execution gap. Here's how it works:
Strategy In
When you onboard, Averi doesn't ask you to fill out a questionnaire about your brand. It scrapes your website and learns.
What Averi extracts automatically:
Your brand voice and tone
Your products and services
Your positioning and differentiators
Your target audience indicators
What you confirm or refine:
Ideal customer profiles (Averi suggests, you validate)
Competitive landscape
Content goals and priorities
The output: a content strategy embedded in the system, not sitting in a separate document. Every piece of content draws from this strategic foundation automatically.
Research Done
For each content piece, Averi handles the research that typically stalls execution:
Keyword opportunity analysis: Is this topic worth pursuing?
Search intent mapping: What does the searcher actually want?
Competitive review: What's ranking, and what's missing?
Source gathering: Facts, statistics, and quotes with hyperlinked citations
This research appears as context for content creation, not as a separate step you have to complete.
Drafts Produced
Averi generates first drafts that:
Follow your brand voice (learned from your website and refined over time)
Include SEO + GEO structure (optimized for both Google and AI citations)
Incorporate researched sources (hyperlinked facts and statistics)
Apply proven content structures (based on what ranks)
These aren't generic AI outputs. They're drafts informed by your specific brand context, strategy, and goals.
Human Refinement
The editing canvas is where AI and humans collaborate:
AI Assist: Highlight any section and ask Averi to rewrite, expand, or adjust—with your brand context intact
Comments: Leave feedback for teammates on specific sections
Tagging: @mention team members to review or contribute
Real-time editing: Multiple team members can work simultaneously
This isn't "AI writes, human fixes."
It's genuine collaboration where AI handles the heavy lifting and humans add the judgment, expertise, and personality that make content resonate.
Quality Built In
Rather than bolting quality control onto the end:
Brand voice is enforced during creation (not checked after)
SEO optimization happens automatically (keywords, structure, meta)
GEO optimization is built into every piece (FAQ sections, entity definitions, authoritative sourcing)
Internal linking is suggested and added by AI
When review happens, it's confirmation of quality rather than discovery of problems.
Published Content Out
The final step that often stalls indefinitely? Averi handles it.
Direct publishing to:
Webflow
Framer
WordPress
& more
Content flows from approved draft to live on your site. CMS fields populate automatically. Internal links connect. Meta information transfers.
No copy-paste formatting. No "I'll publish it tomorrow." Strategy in, published content out.
Compound Learning
Every piece of content goes to your Content Engine, where it:
Trains future voice consistency
Informs topic coverage (preventing redundancy)
Tracks performance
Builds institutional memory
Your 50th piece of content is better than your 5th—not because you worked harder, but because the system learned from everything in between.
The Execution Playbook: Week by Week
Here's what execution actually looks like with the right infrastructure:
Week 1: Foundation
Time investment: 2-3 hours
Activities:
Connect website for Brand Core extraction
Review and refine ICP suggestions
Confirm content goals and priorities
Generate initial content queue
Output: Strategy embedded in system, queue of 10-20 topic opportunities
Weeks 2-4: Building Momentum
Time investment: 3-5 hours/week
Activities:
Select 2-3 topics weekly from queue
Review AI-generated drafts
Refine voice and add expertise
Approve for publishing
Output: 6-12 published pieces in first month
Month 2+: Sustainable Execution
Time investment: 2-4 hours/week
Activities:
Review performance of published content
Approve new topics from continuously refreshed queue
Refine drafts (faster as system learns your voice)
Maintain consistent publishing cadence
Output: 8-12 pieces monthly at quality that ranks
The Math That Works
Traditional execution (without infrastructure):
15-25 hours per quality piece
4 pieces monthly = 60-100 hours
1.5-2.5 full-time equivalents
AI-powered execution (with infrastructure):
2-4 hours per quality piece
8-12 pieces monthly = 16-48 hours
0.4-1.2 full-time equivalents
That's the difference between "we have a content strategy but can't execute" and "we publish consistently and it's working."

Signs You Have an Execution Problem (Not a Strategy Problem)
Before investing in more strategy work, check whether execution is actually your constraint:
You have execution problems if:
✅ You have documented personas, topics, and keyword targets
✅ Your content calendar exists but stays mostly empty
✅ You start blog posts that don't get finished
✅ Publishing happens in bursts followed by long gaps
✅ You know what content you should create
✅ "Bandwidth" is the constant blocker
You have strategy problems if:
❌ You're not sure who you're writing for
❌ You don't know which keywords matter
❌ Topics feel random rather than purposeful
❌ You can't articulate how content supports business goals
❌ Content gets published but nobody reads it
Most teams have execution problems.
They've done the strategy work (or enough of it). What they lack is the infrastructure to turn strategy into consistent output.
Ready to turn strategy into published content?
See How Averi's Content Engine Works →
Additional Resources
Content Strategy & Execution
SEO & Content Performance
The Future of B2B SaaS Marketing: GEO, AI Search, and LLM Optimization
Beyond Google: How to Get Cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Search
AI + Human Content
How to Create Thought Leadership That Doesn't Sound AI-Generated
Scaling Content Creation With AI: Why Human Expertise Still Matters
The AI Content Crisis: Why Your Brand Voice Sounds Like Everyone Else's
Small Team Marketing
Key Definitions
FAQs
We've tried AI content tools before and the output was generic. How is this different?
Generic AI output comes from generic inputs. Tools like ChatGPT have no context about your brand, audience, or positioning—they start fresh every time. Averi's Content Engine learns your brand automatically from your website and maintains persistent context across all content. First drafts already sound like your brand because the system knows your brand. The difference isn't the AI—it's the context infrastructure around it.
How much time does content execution actually require with Averi?
Plan for 2-4 hours per piece of content, including review and refinement. That's compared to 15-25 hours per piece with traditional workflows. The first few pieces may take longer as you calibrate voice and preferences. After that, the system learns and each piece gets faster. Most teams settle into 3-5 hours weekly for 2-3 pieces.
What if I don't have a content strategy at all?
Averi builds the strategy for you. During onboarding, the system analyzes your website, suggests ICPs, researches your competitive landscape, and generates a content marketing plan. You're not starting from scratch—you're refining what Averi discovers. Many teams find this faster than creating strategy from scratch because they're reacting to suggestions rather than generating from nothing.
Can this really replace hiring a content team?
For most startups, Averi can replace 1-2 full-time content hires and outperform them on consistency and speed. What you retain in-house: strategic judgment, expertise refinement, final quality approval. What the system handles: research, drafting, optimization, publishing. The right model is usually "AI + one person's oversight" rather than "AI alone" or "full team without AI."
How long before we see results from content execution?
Content marketing is a compound investment. Initial results (rankings, traffic) typically appear in 2-4 months. Significant momentum (organic traffic as meaningful channel) usually takes 6-12 months of consistent publishing. The key word is consistent—which is what execution infrastructure enables. Sporadic publishing rarely compounds regardless of content quality.
What about industries that require technical expertise?
AI research capabilities have improved dramatically. Averi can gather accurate, cited information on technical topics. But the real answer is: your expertise gets layered on top. AI handles research and drafting. You add the technical nuance, proprietary insights, and expert judgment. This actually produces better content than either alone—AI ensures comprehensiveness while human expertise ensures accuracy and differentiation.
Does this work for regulated industries (finance, healthcare, etc.)?
The workflow supports human review at every stage—nothing publishes without approval. For regulated industries, you'd add your compliance review step before publishing. Averi accelerates everything before compliance review; your compliance process remains intact.





